From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49170139085 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 04:34:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CC11E0D07; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 04:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C938CE0CFF for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 04:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from katipo2.lan (unknown [IPv6:2406:e001:1:d01:de0e:a1ff:fea1:6ec4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kentnl) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC3F2340988 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 04:33:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 17:33:19 +1300 From: Kent Fredric To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement Message-ID: <20170106173319.722a51c0@katipo2.lan> In-Reply-To: <1483499478.26039.3.camel@gentoo.org> References: <4a185773-6144-69b8-a466-0e554732f12f@gentoo.org> <20170101181644.366769b2@abudhabi.paradoxon.rec> <37f7a2ac-6214-deaf-01a3-871cecca96b2@gentoo.org> <20170103120510.325206fa.mgorny@gentoo.org> <1483499478.26039.3.camel@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/6vFHGlNmfoSAq52UbhNIdBZ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: b8986da4-4a8c-4427-804a-341a88d6d2b0 X-Archives-Hash: 33018fcc0b617d872156adf989fc087f --Sig_/6vFHGlNmfoSAq52UbhNIdBZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 05:11:18 +0200 Mart Raudsepp wrote: > I believe with this mgorny has given ample proof that he is just a > ciaranm sock puppet account. One neat trick is to have *two* sock puppet accounts, and then have one accuse the other of being a sock puppet, which typically leads people to not suspect the accuser is also a sock puppet, and instead trust the second account more! Now, Imagine what you could achieve with *three* sock puppet accounts. --Sig_/6vFHGlNmfoSAq52UbhNIdBZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEPZazbI/qrFT1o9rn6FQySxNmqCAFAlhvHhsACgkQ6FQySxNm qCCcPw//SwpO7qFdHjRwbYIWI+QsEw521yx0iJHdrSw7Yb8hi/zB1j4d/6ccpkBc k7FX8BRKzjqavXl2xVTLSBf0M27MguZSUhn3GDgbhRCctE0ueVmqgPe6bu29MDmn iN3sxKkLr4cGexhCPenxnDMS/7GZMg16iAd2w6N9HkkS/FvgAUJEVhr7WuDRNF3u LNpNmb04SdJFfjEH7xRY95Eqxhz4h8qIEL0Bfg3x9IC9YcTFcXNIRNNV2BOFt1eq QQOSaOLk1H0kV7RwDzFrqCDy3qI6dM2rFt2sFjuJX7XGhNTjRNZmzNK9oxlmJyq4 Fhh2gNGCuojW3X47TZp9snnA4j8vY1XVQwM+vj8WxXMOSTHCzvhENovLAwva/MXh Up9fpbqTgiGuJzg6fEhYB9YPWDNg1pbGL0gnOfLAzY0GgQxi4g200IQzoomW6un7 I2tPkWm7AeuBb24Bpf2VxmESd0OH9SMe+Rkw/xF+R8/sbqcAxdMAg7ujEtGleizP durGWW69ptP9eZR+vlRQb8VlsvVq2C4gPhPnv840YIkbbDTAElntkXk/qRdl4YHv o4PdnIiyjhJWGrG9yJPuWSJrWuMuHrzGI53YwNMl8cCU4E5a2D7igKOHSKtSaFon 99wn8g6D005ybrJk9rExfEyvn/r+tVRZldR+K+P37iN6xkFGN/8= =4oxm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/6vFHGlNmfoSAq52UbhNIdBZ--