From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RSSNi-0006B4-FT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:49:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B0B121C119; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F119D21C091 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:48:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id pALBmQ2I018240 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:48:26 +0100 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.2) with ESMTP id pALBmQYx031405; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:48:26 +0100 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id pALBmPmR031404; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:48:25 +0100 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Message-ID: <20170.14985.854918.217250@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:48:25 +0100 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date In-Reply-To: <4ECA0EA3.8020407@gentoo.org> References: <4ECA0EA3.8020407@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.1.1 under 23.3.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: b65b180d-7bdd-45b1-8216-f3730d9b0053 X-Archives-Hash: 06f4cece777d7d2c43b68dfdc439a1ea >>>>> On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, Pawe=B3 Hajdan, wrote: > I'm attaching a list of packages that are sitting in the tree for at > least 6 months (180 days, way more than 30 days required for > stabilization) and should be ready for stabilization. > Please review the list, it's 800+ packages so I thought about asking > for feedback before filing stabilization bugs (I plan to do that in > stages of course). >From the packages that I (co-)maintain, you can go ahead and file stabilisation bugs for the following ones: > (u'app-emacs/elib', u'app-emacs/elib-1.0', u'app-emacs/elib-1.0-r1', 'e= macs') > (u'app-emacs/folding', u'app-emacs/folding-2007.0506', u'app-emacs/fold= ing-2009.0905.0811', 'emacs') > (u'app-emacs/howm', u'app-emacs/howm-1.3.8', u'app-emacs/howm-1.3.9.1',= 'emacs') > (u'app-emacs/http-emacs', u'app-emacs/http-emacs-1.1', u'app-emacs/http= -emacs-1.1-r1', 'emacs') > (u'app-emacs/mew', u'app-emacs/mew-6.2', u'app-emacs/mew-6.3', 'emacs') > (u'app-emacs/ocaml-mode', u'app-emacs/ocaml-mode-3.11.2', u'app-emacs/o= caml-mode-3.12.0', 'ml emacs') > (u'app-emacs/psgml', u'app-emacs/psgml-1.2.5-r1', u'app-emacs/psgml-1.3= .2', 'emacs sgml') > (u'app-emacs/python-mode', u'app-emacs/python-mode-5.1.0', u'app-emacs/= python-mode-5.2.0', 'emacs') > (u'dev-tex/catdvi', u'dev-tex/catdvi-0.14', u'dev-tex/catdvi-0.14-r1', = 'ulm tex') > (u'dev-util/cscope', u'dev-util/cscope-15.7a', u'dev-util/cscope-15.7a-= r1', 'vim emacs') These are also o.k. from my side, but really the CJK team should decide on them: > (u'app-emacs/ddskk', u'app-emacs/ddskk-13.1-r1', u'app-emacs/ddskk-14.2= ', 'cjk emacs') > (u'app-emacs/navi2ch', u'app-emacs/navi2ch-1.8.3-r1', u'app-emacs/navi2= ch-1.8.4', 'cjk emacs') And the following one has some issues, so it shouldn't be stabilised, but let's wait for the next minor release: > (u'app-emacs/vm', u'app-emacs/vm-8.0.12-r6', u'app-emacs/vm-8.1.1', 'em= acs') Ulrich