From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAAA01395E2 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 03:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01D0421C20B; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 03:35:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C64021C1BB for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 03:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cerberus.civica.com.au (watch.civica.com.au [203.56.2.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: wraeth) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09B82340988 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 03:35:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 14:35:28 +1100 From: Sam Jorna To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gpg: signing failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device Message-ID: <20161212033527.GA18232@cerberus.civica.com.au> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-Archives-Salt: 3a4e68f1-bbb3-4b79-a270-ec3d0eab7f7e X-Archives-Hash: fedce16d8a4e9bd7d580c1f22d66ed9d --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 09:34:21AM +0700, grozin@gentoo.org wrote:=0D > On Sun, 11 Dec 2016, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:=0D > > On 12/11/2016 03:13 PM, grozin@gentoo.org wrote:=0D > >> gpg: signing failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device=0D > > this might indicate a want for export GPG_TTY=3D$(tty)=0D > I don't understand what has really happened. I removed my last commit, an= =0D > attempt to commit it again failed with gpg: signing failed. Then I logged= =0D > out of the box on which I have the git tree (I log in this box via ssh), = =0D > and logged in again. After that the commit succeeded.=0D =0D I was also getting some odd issues with commit signing, though it seemed =0D to settle for me when I switched to pinentry-curses (since I use =0D awesome), so I figured it was probably a local issue. Perhaps there's a =0D wider problem here?=0D =0D -- =0D Sam Jorna (wraeth)=0D GnuPG Key: D6180C26=0D --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQKmBAEBCgCQFiEEkOOCivPPbnU/QAv/9azmicmnVzwFAlhOGv9fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDkw RTM4MjhBRjNDRjZFNzUzRjQwMEJGRkY1QUNFNjg5QzlBNzU3M0MSHHdyYWV0aEBn ZW50b28ub3JnAAoJEPWs5onJp1c89uYP/iJ27+efJtizUmpAyaeErn/QHlLM+I3N U0/udYUrkI38XE+6pHWyVe+UrYwNT8m5vn+7n+jDl/HYju7GyxnI69AtNr5A/W+1 ayv5yF797+IzQ+nFSffI0k2lyC3cQVg8AMsRQCxN0/uy5xX3vJDVfxP0DdW5c5gr HDolfcBFYOxjx7vKTMZMp9wdo5TJUt/RzfVATOrYgsaoEFa8BTRVRoMvtAHfyVD/ moLQ+/5h4f+gl/H/BB8rZ/sh2zwNJVs1bJ0MvK1d9IJQlBLT0IjmmgkS79zLNqvR SuhYdmb9E1iVumTqcX6i7s2ubzDuk2Eea0rXja+s8qLTkBjjAEwDi7w+xbDQBHLY vYZmvN3PdCF1TXa3PqOihum4OC1WqqUgtxZunQ58fFcwcZpV2pVmmBahF9Y8vubM UddDWnXnEuFhV8L6qBA1BrUfNtFFYpr5I7AfYpt2GX4+w3mK1X6x/pVgDDfUsPDS 4Ds3o3VzTVaNS0u8q3iVCZkSNaSuBaVwZiAJfZlnCXnM8ePvoS8WPKCnPUWo9iP0 cK/hZVzkWTSws3XpUODogdcdz2jmGPE7eDA2CvfwUoWDc/zKZ9DX9Q83BwGwV/9u RA6kespum3c/kXWdHyI0YMijRpLr4FcQNwnPQXQzWHgh0h6bQeue8T6LV0OJyiwW +cBBwkVr/wqP =9mcD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q--