From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE7171395E2 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 23:25:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 270C5E0B71; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 23:25:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAE83E0B03 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 23:25:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [100.42.103.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: williamh) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1EB6341398 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 23:25:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:25:14 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tmpfiles virtual Message-ID: <20161116232514.GB25646@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <2b376e60-26a1-04bf-44ba-fc07d8da4b7a@gentoo.org> <20161116150823.GA18287@linux1.gaikai.biz> <91eafc74-1fd4-e9cf-e5e6-687ff2cc53df@gentoo.org> <20161116170312.GA24186@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> <20161116202141.GA24625@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> <0f810029-6c69-dd94-5fcb-45a9de68b63c@gentoo.org> <20161116231632.GA25646@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> <6541c5c5-d9b1-8ffe-ff85-fd96eb37b320@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6541c5c5-d9b1-8ffe-ff85-fd96eb37b320@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Archives-Salt: a6ad7341-46df-4720-8fd8-b2073ba84862 X-Archives-Hash: 8eb46c84f75b3441c0e10492b977976e --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:19:28PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 16/11/16 06:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:09:59PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > >> On 16/11/16 03:21 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > >>> > >>> I can make the service scripts call the systemd-tmpfiles service if it > >>> is available or if not call the opentmpfiles implementation. > >>> > >>> I'm not sure whether it is worth having a separate package for the > >>> service scripts in this case. > >> > >> That would depend on where the service scripts are sitting, I guess -- > >> do you mean here that openrc will keep its current tmpfiles.dev and > >> tmpfiles.setup scripts? If that's the case wouldn't openrc need to > >> RDEPEND or PDEPEND on virtual/tmpfiles ? > >=20 > > No, those scripts will be removed from OpenRC. If you grep through > > OpenRC, you will see that once they are removed, they are never actually > > referred to by any other services that are part of OpenRC. > >=20 > > The scripts will be put in opentmpfiles and that ebuild will install > > them. > >=20 > > William > >=20 >=20 > Then we're back to the exact same issue. opentmpfiles won't be > installed if systemd is installed, so the scripts won't get installed. =20 Why not? we can just add opentmpfiles to the pdepend of systemd the same way udev-init-scripts is. William --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAlgs6toACgkQblQW9DDEZTjHHACfTutpUeAqqBD1f9YvPcdZDnlj FC4AoI6t9FBlBAqjQs3OkVoFLYwdu+L1 =9YQV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU--