From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0ABC138330 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:08:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FB7921C1CD; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:08:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28CE821C1AA for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2404:e800:e600:57b:515f:3d06:8d:d549]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: perfinion) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B3A834087C for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:08:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:08:05 +0800 From: Jason Zaman To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc runscript transition (draft 3) Message-ID: <20160824120805.GB20943@meriadoc.perfinion.com> References: <20160822225743.GA19359@linux1> <20160824193205.0ad0f559@katipo2.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160824193205.0ad0f559@katipo2.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Archives-Salt: 10911187-dc8f-4dd3-9bef-0a31ccd5b3e6 X-Archives-Hash: 9614f2268603169faf569703cfd49214 On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 07:32:05PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:57:43 -0500 > William Hubbs wrote: > > > I thought about dropping the version number from the > > display-if-installed line, but that doesn't make sense because it means > > that everyone, including all new installs of OpenRC after this version, > > would have to read the newsitem. > > > > William > > > > That concern is in the wrong priority. > > "Your system might break" is more important than "ugh, annoying news items" > > Viewing the news item once per clean install is still less of a "Problem" than I remember some time back there was talk about marking some news items as read in new stage3's. That basically removes this annoyance completely. I don't know how that ended up tho, maybe we should re-visit it? -- Jason