From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD98C13832E for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 21:51:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F233821C139; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 21:51:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25D67E0BDC for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 21:51:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from katipo2.lan (unknown [IPv6:2406:e001:1:d01:c2f8:daff:fe83:ed01]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kentnl) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B20FD340CCE for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 21:51:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:49:48 +1200 From: Kent Fredric To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree Message-ID: <20160815094948.01c44015@katipo2.lan> In-Reply-To: <20160814224507.2b4e07b6@snowflex> References: <6046d13b-1a54-aa5e-ab16-df448b0f8c59@gentoo.org> <20160814224507.2b4e07b6@snowflex> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/W.lVX4Od1nZCbv0KJb7P.4w"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 11cecc8a-cab7-4ec7-81a1-7af5408433ce X-Archives-Hash: 4d27cf181569caf9b317b29d97994193 --Sig_/W.lVX4Od1nZCbv0KJb7P.4w Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 22:45:07 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > What's a Working Group, and how is it related to a Project? Shouldn't > there be a GLEP to define what a Working Group is first? So if a group of people wanted to write such a GLEP ... would they have to be part of a defined Project first, or would they form a Working Group, and then be stuck in a recursive loop needing themselves defined before they can define themselves? --Sig_/W.lVX4Od1nZCbv0KJb7P.4w Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXsOe0AAoJEOhUMksTZqgg0NUP/A52LvJRZ1NOYi6qysJSSHUd AzT2JI/9wEtzoa3+Rwz5Xp/wDOPeHY2/ntsbRhDC1+O4hA0lcY5fClKPA0W/skls AXzAi1NdVhsJQtdqXPd3Srtg5/fCmqCWNcDn8iGPlWJ++svwSjc8dgUiAeLLnZNa ZdKAZz2mj3ITjSwNsNkIRsVKyXmbN4UOtEB+L+Q05GDW23XZevCda6TP4B8OxSTB d7VXK3xA3CBTNcSxccxpR8q04pG/U4a1f/5C+tAe/4C50YAtIvYv97QKXqr/2nmn fk/DjuFk0+aifEoLYLExGs8XwG/Ib+HH813kgz++B7ckIH84UCHWSj29lPF3S8ob tMNjIbMa0o70rodLs1oKygJNwiUQQEq9+JDbzRNZoX50IqSilr8xvw93vztEQ8Cb xBZkBxl08V+WhsPErRLzlrkaOxOP3ndp2sKckRhT/1pYoHDVypRgKy/BElIuQMyt +fVmReY6cAz0bjUywi5MJ5Hhrp6qR0KF5DUsln/h2CrVpXrgYVeM5RfPy9arLso6 hKApcy7vCsOexvzdcybesrFttIHjE7Fzbzbf9M+xfQw1glfwTcvdGriK3JJwm2t9 C4DbGGrM6esXua52SFuBnU0a2z8jlbZcen+buuK8YtiQLEevmS0XSLDJnLiQn0YK ZWTo8ToiEWrUQPVLTDik =I/3v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/W.lVX4Od1nZCbv0KJb7P.4w--