From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C4F1382BD for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:51:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A34F3E0AB0; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:51:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4E87E097B for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:51:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D01ED33FEDE; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 14:51:26 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: Fabian Groffen Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] bugs.g.o: Merging UNCONFIRMED & CONFIRMED into NEW Message-ID: <20160616145126.541b7065.mgorny@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20160616124143.fflmhnhwcrlids5y@gentoo.org> References: <20160616142647.01b0e975.mgorny@gentoo.org> <20160616124143.fflmhnhwcrlids5y@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/3ssVnMipO0tfLdQFP3uKrKo"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 74ce2059-afff-43b2-9dcf-46a3e0beb0f9 X-Archives-Hash: 7077774186a99864a850df6e8423c51c --Sig_/3ssVnMipO0tfLdQFP3uKrKo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 14:41:43 +0200 Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 16-06-2016 14:26:47 +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > Hello, everyone. > >=20 > > Here's my second RFC wrt bugs.gentoo.org redesign. > >=20 > > Right now we have separate UNCONFIRMED and CONFIRMED states for bugs. > > However, we use the two scarcely. I believe it would be beneficial to > > replace the two with a single NEW state. =20 > ...=20 > > Your thoughts? =20 >=20 > How about UNRESOLVED instead? Else you get bugs which are NEW for years > even though they have activity all over. We could also use plain 'OPEN' ;-). --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/3ssVnMipO0tfLdQFP3uKrKo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXYqDOXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2REJCMDdDQzRGMERBRDA2RUEwQUZFNDFC MDdBMUFFQUVGQjQ0NjRFAAoJELB6GurvtEZOIkgP/0SsNKEJlDIgd4X2jedsvSmt iJozcZmS2IZ+I0XQogRzQGLRNiooMUL/r+SkhEz4FFPBDv38kiPnprs9upRdZ49P MqCTWG/8l6otP5K/tjMAL9K2uOx7eZbj3r0WlCjNenDrTDCqVA+W5QThHNpx3VX1 o50MPQvGzKNuyAEbUvuzcgDpHp15vWyyCbq3mzTUTzXLQC88NFXzNfQyYtFhG2Su CeOpbLnedxhAycuOkTBt9DQMacBAsQISSLYDTm6nbiPoYGxNeXBETcikhleGKxQA JCq+0LEvCPiQghRuJ7EUiMlWIzywJp6yQh6lT4dvdTXomDa0hcisLaFrOEGpxbfZ NSlarVN2BvcPXKYDUs+Wce3o8QWaEL9Xaqp5BppYWm6WWP43R7NyqMm/RJFZqa6h WZwgZrvbd3OyrHhfIIBCBWeufceeK6eAs0vG2UPM9vjUvFLSg72w/QmF+7xIJfYs sgdUkDU9ybBpSVtoTwnmfhHVtly59LQ+7x7v0AduSlIpSCIipHtnpy32pgW8BoPx u41FQ0fc+L5/ApVyitSeDqmARJn+57hrU41uH9XRGLTQDHsjBevBCq15Tx1UaL60 SfAHYnOXzXZFa1cydxzDU2bo57B1ksb+8cga50zlrXw89rpHSOxU9hUd4QMURiCj vFG4HYvfDC7Xelq7UR/B =VaFY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/3ssVnMipO0tfLdQFP3uKrKo--