From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7959213829C for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:45:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3180F14242; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:45:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F4011418A for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7FC30340813; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 23:45:20 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: "Anthony G. Basile" Cc: Gentoo Development Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council Council: call for agenda items for June 12 meeting Message-ID: <20160610234520.3c90b8c7.mgorny@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20160603160625.54085996.mgorny@gentoo.org> References: <702470fc-8f33-8d01-b372-e975d13abf7e@gentoo.org> <20160603160625.54085996.mgorny@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/zP+JQ/KZIxXsGYqfDfeS_Gp"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: b799a262-dbbe-4a53-8f52-e281db6366bc X-Archives-Hash: 669e5d5d4ca5c58244cfa90be29fb238 --Sig_/zP+JQ/KZIxXsGYqfDfeS_Gp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, Considering the strength of response from a Council member, I would like to officially apologize for providing the agenda items and I would like to withdraw them all appropriately. Thank you for your time, and I wish you re-election. On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 16:06:25 +0200 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 07:01:03 -0400 > "Anthony G. Basile" wrote: >=20 > > Hi everyone, > >=20 > > The Council will be meeting on Sunday June 12. This is a call for any > > agenda items. =20 >=20 > In preferred order of discussion (i.e. shortest topics first): >=20 > 1. the 'file installation masks' GLEP [spec:1, RFC:2, bug:3]. It still > hasn't been merged by the GLEP editors but it's otherwise ready with > reference implementation for Portage. Preferably please discuss this > separately/before LINGUAS as it is quite generic and I think having it > approved would benefit us. The part specifically needing Council > approval is the extra configuration file in metadata/ dir of the > repository. >=20 > 2. The patch fixing USE_EXPAND handling in Portage to adhere to > the rules enforced by the PMS for EAPI 5 and newer [patch:4, > patch v1:5, bug:6]. The patch comes in two variants. The former > (preferred by me) applies the change to all EAPIs since this way we can > kill the ugly logic for earlier EAPIs and PMS leaves the behavior > undefined for them. The latter applies it only to EAPI 5 and newer, > leaving current behavior for older EAPIs. I don't think it really makes > sense to have different logic as EAPI 5 is quite common already, and > different behavior will only increase confusion. >=20 > 3. New sys-devel/gcc USE=3Dmultislot [QA bug:7]. I originally wanted to > do this via QA but considering the replies to bugs opened so far, I > think Council approval would be additionally helpful. The key point of > my request would be to kill the flag, and stop force-removing old > versions implicitly. >=20 > 4. LINGUAS [8,9]. Long story short, PMS considered, we implicitly strip > localizations from most of the packages out there. I think the first > step towards fixing it that the most people can approve is renaming > the USE_EXPAND from LINGUAS to I18N or L10N, or generally something > else, plus a news item. >=20 > 5. USE=3Dgui [10]. It seems to get some appreciation but I suspect it's > going to end up going to the Council anyway. >=20 > I think that's all for now. If I recall something else, I'll let you > know. >=20 >=20 > [1]:https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:MGorny/GLEP:INSTALL_MASK > [2]:https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/af5de8be051fdf60d4d4ae= f97df6e683 > [3]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D584452 > [4]:https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage-dev/message/42e3a134d14e33= e037e35e6c5df9d05d > [5]:https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage-dev/message/b79fc6bd174a35= 6c62bda59d0b0e9e8e > [6]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D583750 > [7]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D584610 > [8]:https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/a08ea09c2c8e534fd9bc11= 46703c66ff > [9]:https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/41e09d1ddc8b30abb9f9d2= 1d205b7b82 > [10]:https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/eecad370248118c474a0d= 819fa7f3576 >=20 --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/zP+JQ/KZIxXsGYqfDfeS_Gp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXWzTwXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2REJCMDdDQzRGMERBRDA2RUEwQUZFNDFC MDdBMUFFQUVGQjQ0NjRFAAoJELB6GurvtEZOQDgQAN8n4vPGaQFOokasqZbuw8fM m9Rr7DC63eUjeoabUqh3PVBZ7UtEAx3orJKs43bgExqIeMF66H3jl7qvveCD1Ang lvzxDqL9GqP/o5EQlJklKrhjxvXCDURNPISHAW5L/StSUdIhSvFvN7ri5G3x7h2c qSVXYWN0CqURkcb/E3mixn4UARXxGIo1fC+EKIB18FlfC3coCCjnVzdWDS9eJnay QlDoEjPoAIK5LNfndh7yT3+9BOc07qO9oCJ3jSUC7tqhWD5tdBmA4WDWHyRKPsbC z98b/Q8FzC7kloQ5uCyynvgYJUzFH2A88z8CRxy978tq9H+kYevMWG/mL3nMydug clTrLWA6hwTiNUIJRxqlQ9IjwQGCVrWQE2rIr7uC3Bf7VBT9ab3/eRLwWwLCrqM9 zuqyGoef3C6+yJ8fLy2cqQa9CA26wdw3ZMwyEOJ+BiC6AClm75YVO28BW8X+0X1t 9LVHHykC5z2yXPyfsuSN8PSsp+0cklnISpFqyV7Y2r0lywMaXB/HDM6v5s9dd00X bHQbLj2+UPX29MiN12m5bKONH/Q6BfGN3FewUFTKr2RNAG6PdgDDDU8Tae4Z1Q9L +I2rF5tVmWIUWHZWjXfjrr7I2VMlMlEmphNWLlByJ+5pYRsBVDxlHChbawIjZGvN TCY6b3oJW8QDR0DF8/i6 =yDSy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/zP+JQ/KZIxXsGYqfDfeS_Gp--