From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68ED13829C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 13:14:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A50681425A; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 13:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B75314145 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 13:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 55E3F340D04; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 13:14:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:14:34 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: Ulrich Mueller Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New GLEP: file installation masks Message-ID: <20160608151434.0398881c.mgorny@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <22359.55401.566471.496926@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <20160520160117.3c400970.mgorny@gentoo.org> <22359.44157.475779.594768@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20160608083730.411f8140.mgorny@gentoo.org> <22359.50802.120064.86645@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <22359.55401.566471.496926@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/b9d6zBQI=pOlcRUqHGKXtnT"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: dfc82381-f70d-44c7-9527-ae444114315b X-Archives-Hash: 686cb460c0725f03a9a8f557519dfcf0 --Sig_/b9d6zBQI=pOlcRUqHGKXtnT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 10:33:45 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: =20 >=20 > > I though the goal was to rid profiles/ of files other than profiles. =20 >=20 > Thinking about it, putting it into profiles would make a lot of sense. > For example, one would want to define any systemd paths only in > non-systemd profiles. If you put it like this, it indeed makes some sense. So should it be fully profile-oriented (i.e. profiles/base being the base) or profiles+top profile directory for all repos? --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/b9d6zBQI=pOlcRUqHGKXtnT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXWBo6XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2REJCMDdDQzRGMERBRDA2RUEwQUZFNDFC MDdBMUFFQUVGQjQ0NjRFAAoJELB6GurvtEZOu5YP/0JgBX3ynmPyy2ygXopFSAn6 0Z3UWGhGalrFTDP61JDYmbo/nE5Ord1Si6B7zFW9I+CGc/24IFKx5FJsWA/B3Dbo W9t5PCGhKcisSUnZz1rsvSMUIt9cw2nMs1deZ+xpiom8QXM61OyqPDi3Q3CnNeBZ 8t4Zu3s0il4XWpl9fQOBaFpq2hdKVW60Qbqgy1eHSqNxeuTxs1Qbv/tE2ZOoSvbO UEZM2UxnUNolfjzpM4yLnXbEgS1uJCac2rIEc5qA7gM9MygUpKswGkYsQ0G/X1l1 H8/5EI9rtJVknsKJnj9FVDtURXkqiitmvTSN+toyJZL6/XEyrC+E3KLtakY2gXiu Nr3QJmFTRpQHxUUlGB/EhunPPwLzutS0b9nS+fQmBbdsgNvXA3GPPuv9oksRrnMX sP5hnJeHV1tpubovijjhq6l5Rci08igwF2smh44oM2OzqFBG7uJRGTI+b2pfall9 7V8nW9PKWKEWj5I8F77q0A3l5fT3YvAlvFKVDMrLIB9NANdnBFa22ipjD3te4r9o qm8GJLSgCdhTfwgxENed3MnG3Qbfwootws3wq2d/x7GKAokrX4733N3TESbDxW7G J3vTq0S4fVGveF9bX8UNWSQOXi5EnQt64WXzvtRWGlHFuIeScC1nN+2gee1ULdFH +lu0cbQUK9CvlUweFTWD =Bv2W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/b9d6zBQI=pOlcRUqHGKXtnT--