From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-76175-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECAE13829C
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2016 08:22:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3EE2E25402A;
	Mon,  6 Jun 2016 08:22:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.schwarzvogel.de (skade.schwarzvogel.de [144.76.18.87])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E053254020
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2016 08:22:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from klausman by mail.schwarzvogel.de with local (Exim 4.87)
	(envelope-from <klausman@schwarzvogel.de>)
	id 1b9pnN-000Rkp-2G
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 10:22:01 +0200
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 10:22:01 +0200
From: Tobias Klausmann <klausman@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Can ATs add missing test deps?
Message-ID: <20160606082200.GA105497@skade.schwarzvogel.de>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Sender: Tobias Klausmann <klausman@schwarzvogel.de>
X-Archives-Salt: 1d2f3b16-4d28-4e63-b7a9-31c49bdc4b74
X-Archives-Hash: 100892acff19ae7986eb8cb6982bd3ac

Hi! 

It happens every now and then that during ATing, I find that
USE=test should pull in extra deps. This usually is an easy and
not exactly controversial fix.

What's the hive mind's opinion on letting ATs add such deps if:

- Only one level deep, but multiple first-level deps are ok
- The deps themselves are already marked arch/~arch to the same
  level as the package needing them*
- The deps themselves are not humunguous when it comes to
  compile/test times.

* And by this I mean *all* arch/~arch keywords the base package
has, not just the one(s) the AT currently cares about.

Thoughts?

Regards,
Tobias

-- 
panic("floppy: Port bolixed.");
        linux-2.2.16/include/asm-sparc/floppy.h