From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C0613829C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 00:02:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F2A8114245; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 00:02:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13295141FE for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 00:02:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (ultrachro.me [91.121.149.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: monsieurp@gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70BC0340B65 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 00:02:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gentoo.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) monsieurp@gentoo.org; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 02:02:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 02:02:06 +0200 From: Patrice Clement To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] app-text/htmltidy: Maintainer Request Message-ID: <20160606000206.GA16974@ultrachro.me> References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Archives-Salt: c6167b00-e4f6-4003-8579-b14a2d8895ab X-Archives-Hash: 95ced903da269c062dfc18e24d5eb81b --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sunday 05 Jun 2016 19:39:26, Yury German wrote : > app-text/htmltidy currently has no maintainers. It has a vulnerability > [Security Bug] filed against it. And a number of other [package depend > on it]. Is nyone willing to pick it up? >=20 > [Secuity Bug] > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D561452 >=20 > [package depend on it] > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/genrdeps/dindex/app-text/htmltidy > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/genrdeps/rindex/app-text/htmltidy >=20 > ______________________________ > Yury German > GLSA Coordinator | Gentoo Security Team > Administrator | Planet Gentoo > Email: blueknight@gentoo.org >=20 > GPG Fingerprint: 8858 89D6 C0C4 75C4 D0DD FA00 EEAF ED89 024C 043 > Don't bother. Have a look at [1], [2] & [3] to find out why. tl;dr htmltidy has got to be culled at some point since it's now considered obsol= ete after tidy-html5 entered the tree a little while ago. It's roughly the same codebase yet it's HTML 5 compliant. Yay! I've been maintaining the latter since its inclusion in the Portage tree but would definitely need help to remove the former. I didn't swap htmltidy for tidy-html5 cause they're two different projects. As you can see from the li= nks above, htmltidy has a gazillion deps. [1]: http://tidy.sourceforge.net/ [2]: http://www.html-tidy.org/ [3]: https://github.com/htacg/tidy-html5 --=20 Patrice Clement Gentoo Linux developer http://www.gentoo.org --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJXVL1+AAoJEJGRpfGTSRu4lV4H/093Ynrb08e0Q2ZP+9RfDzms 51vWWbKV5cQ7iNpIjVWTTTEBLdGbHAY6un7+qQwPKg92+a6e9xSyRx6sJV33jiTM u7IrkHXLfRBNPZzwBTSEXUyqfj0sYWzg0qw1yYtvyQ2vR/8lzMlkAT961sbnVZ+O u6Vktbxw16FXr1V2t96UVZ83gptoUtXfJXZorqxRxljaYdjwYA4d3bp5ysgWaB+K vPFC0R2sC2OHlOeekslfUZtMia20euZH3dnlHDy+RjqvfGFYpLlWxEfmKFALQtVr jmgcV1q/7/HwHvum7rmyNydsCMs5xEFeDMzVrqbQ3TxvT1q2kFcl5TJx+10dt/E= =UK17 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J--