From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127B913828B for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 21:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D7B6141A1; Fri, 27 May 2016 21:09:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f51.google.com (mail-oi0-f51.google.com [209.85.218.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DFBA21C039 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 21:09:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f51.google.com with SMTP id w184so185563820oiw.2 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 14:09:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=PCe9ym4gGzx33Bbhq1dHpNZaAb3f+WVru/VQjsbxXzs=; b=hi7b3u48xlKKXMm6+jdFai196zrQZkw144cDBsVmU4pn0nft9y6eRdnl7+UnRs/eR0 s7KjR+IOs9kjvsIW9fkisDqDP60Y/pceFSwYISYRUMY4Do/f2V3Ea/GsqsYhywV5P2id 0Q31GWR4qkWj0p1CQ4NB6QYwQAIGgqGynQyPowoR5JDGlDUlRvMfouxSkMXU34NPxqU1 ltLbM1Y+c1oxi3QX4cGkhxO7y7F5L/tUQbasqLS4bukxvT+U6mX9xql2epUBwgnVlDxu iNUMkT8eI+/VdYmT3p4YN3Sb9fP7O390bi5zl8nO4+zeWgwDvsp4gGOSXwe5ONciDW1O +wFQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=PCe9ym4gGzx33Bbhq1dHpNZaAb3f+WVru/VQjsbxXzs=; b=T6038Qqn0qmd0SnHMPdi3cK6rPeiQhHm6gjmPqnK7//oASf1q5AeiRsSJM7bM+NgFt qf/+EsEDGh/6cSByRerhBnAaufy/3KLy92PvPxRYi9gxqiJN08TdSL+cpNYN8d+5DCAz PYEGQ1bS//wmvPu3nV9zJK+nl3HeJvX9/4LROJAbJo2J+i8wcSXqT4sQ3p26YpJ/xJ01 l60ovrOnTp8dtg84XQj0pf+V5OeMrNOLwjmASckzb09AYNgCDO6bFa/KgKWacS5cj+E9 lNH/r3U/0HU5HDb2w7c5iQ7yqmt5BeCPKkwjgCUrsio0oDDPKfupX8Gzmh5+QLvlOs4D kcEA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLs4Bxdiac8tTCqT1dhfAou+yhC2RnEQMqsMmHDyZFvkU41kbgQiTeKW3ZFvCNSkg== X-Received: by 10.202.217.136 with SMTP id q130mr10095893oig.127.1464383381185; Fri, 27 May 2016 14:09:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-66-68-34-247.austin.res.rr.com. [66.68.34.247]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 20sm10004431otd.18.2016.05.27.14.09.39 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 May 2016 14:09:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: (nullmailer pid 12651 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 27 May 2016 21:09:39 -0000 Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 16:09:39 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] gtk/gtk2/gtk3 USE flag situation Message-ID: <20160527210939.GA12635@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1464358866.13834.59.camel@gentoo.org> <1e38b9eb-268b-30ca-d29e-060ffdb1db97@gentoo.org> <20160527174420.GA10125@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> <0e8fb805-1a94-bd83-a194-b642b1e5ba50@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0e8fb805-1a94-bd83-a194-b642b1e5ba50@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Archives-Salt: 62d57168-12e7-40fd-848d-df88f7a72e3e X-Archives-Hash: 7e2bee01f371266dc5b213df37afe88b --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 01:55:41PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 5/27/16 1:44 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 01:14:17PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > >> On 5/27/16 12:59 PM, rindeal wrote: > >>> On 27 May 2016 at 18:54, landis blackwell = wrote: > >>>> I stopped reading after you reminded me it was 2016 > >>> > >>> Good to know, thanks for stopping by. > >>> > >> > >> Yeah the "its year" meme has been making its rounds of the > >> internet. > >> > >> anyhow, my 2017 question is about avahi. right now i have USE=3Dgtk a= nd > >> gtk3, where gtk really means gtk2. i'm not going to change that becau= se > >> it fits QA's specs. but i could remove it altogether and just drop gt= k2 > >> support for the next release. good idea? bad idea? i guess i'm aski= ng > >> whats the status of gtk2 in gentoo seeing as its dead upstream. > >=20 > > From QA's pov, the gtk2 support is up to you, but I also would recommend > > adding a gtk2 use flag if you keep it around. The idea is to eventually > > get away from the non-versioned use flag. >=20 > It wouldn't be adding, it would be renaming a flag which is possible but > annoying. Anyhow I'll cross that bridge after the next release of avahi. Ok, I did mis-speak a bit here. You can keep the gtk use flag, but it refers to gtk2 only. The gtk3 use flag should be used for gtk3. Thanks, William --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAldIt40ACgkQblQW9DDEZTiWfACfXmAqXdg6ytveUuYT+3LixrHi VEgAoKWlRvKzjXXdv/50amshdRri+mwd =bo2B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq--