From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3F013828B for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 17:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F4E5224057; Fri, 27 May 2016 17:52:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4779421C012 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 17:52:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [100.42.103.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: williamh) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4499340C01 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 17:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 12:44:20 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] gtk/gtk2/gtk3 USE flag situation Message-ID: <20160527174420.GA10125@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1464358866.13834.59.camel@gentoo.org> <1e38b9eb-268b-30ca-d29e-060ffdb1db97@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1e38b9eb-268b-30ca-d29e-060ffdb1db97@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Archives-Salt: 03978eae-7fac-4684-af0b-aa5916a9974a X-Archives-Hash: 0549f1d0cceff463401356d923900b24 --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 01:14:17PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 5/27/16 12:59 PM, rindeal wrote: > > On 27 May 2016 at 18:54, landis blackwell w= rote: > >> I stopped reading after you reminded me it was 2016 > >=20 > > Good to know, thanks for stopping by. > >=20 >=20 > Yeah the "its year" meme has been making its rounds of the > internet. >=20 > anyhow, my 2017 question is about avahi. right now i have USE=3Dgtk and > gtk3, where gtk really means gtk2. i'm not going to change that because > it fits QA's specs. but i could remove it altogether and just drop gtk2 > support for the next release. good idea? bad idea? i guess i'm asking > whats the status of gtk2 in gentoo seeing as its dead upstream. =46rom QA's pov, the gtk2 support is up to you, but I also would recommend adding a gtk2 use flag if you keep it around. The idea is to eventually get away from the non-versioned use flag. Thanks, William --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAldIh24ACgkQblQW9DDEZThozwCgkdfV/6221MDeoD2bXHIdhbWs dQAAn3OnFW7A7wvtbtlu9NWW8aRlNJlM =EJor -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z--