From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9118A13825A for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 16:32:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A73E234003; Mon, 16 May 2016 16:32:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de [81.169.146.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 668CE21C04E for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 16:32:31 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcyy9p4roSnp5yQo4oJ5cg== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from pinacolada.localnet (88-133-183-17.hsi.glasfaser-ostbayern.de [88.133.183.17]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 37.26 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id y03e01s4GGWSv5Z (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (curve secp521r1 with 521 ECDH bits, eq. 15360 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate) for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 18:32:28 +0200 (CEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/ Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 18:32:22 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.2.4-gentoo; KDE/4.14.19; x86_64; ; ) References: <1462655928.66afcab271f65b97330e610040ad3acc1b812a03.hd_brummy@gentoo> <20160516100533.0dbf98b2@snowflex> <20160516192127.15b9024ee94501b208ba9739@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20160516192127.15b9024ee94501b208ba9739@gentoo.org> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201605161832.28207.dilfridge@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: f8978ec4-6bc0-40d5-80e5-91b1ce85d160 X-Archives-Hash: a9ec85f4e39b520164e878106c780d2d -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Am Montag, 16. Mai 2016, 18:21:27 schrieb Andrew Savchenko: > > Everyone can and will make mistakes, this is normal. Only those who > do nothing make no mistakes. I see no reason why developer should > be discouraged from contributing for a single blunder. Of course, > if blunder rate is too high, comrel should take an action; but this > is not the case here. > Just for the record, this is where qa should step in, not comrel. - -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.1 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXOfYWXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRDMjhGQ0IwRjdCRUQxMzdBQUNCMDJEODlB NDRDRjM3M0U3RUU5OUU0AAoJEKRM83Pn7pnkx8UP/RyUttstbaWVUMiAQ1gZBYeh Ry93bojoZ+nV/H/vjVOGb6f2X2TtbyOx4c8krm/QekA/pMZCppn1oIpNRRaZdoPN TB165er/86NzXmoez9Hq5HFVFNbT56SFSyiTTT8uzbn2/phOsWy1FkwRD1Fjs4OA x9TZgrlFrnfwMlUHhtjbVQTuz0Cn+SYo1HSZ61hV5Y1YLm8MwSWZoS1mRDp65rD/ G5umBuhTHQplBY/ZBdvuR2R8/6/hQQfqI7E7wEj5MvUp98nReJjtYSP3c8WWQYhg 3OeGzyO+USIBGciSXu01ZUGQE4r7XnJ7uiq84wbp1PTVWXYCd8G6tmF7dMzgK8EO GfCfQuDNIAFgJSzIT0u0D1VltX47kdaWVzpet8qsjP+Ucr4cMvYyaDkrTP7cg0cY 8viaMpG3skVsiDRxRBy/E0mBbl0NxzSehZVxGV9x7f/lfsN8WIIlxID4RfisAWPf haXtclEKppbK9BdHXrBCYKFOBd0botAjYQhGylhwtnM/22N7v5SaHRezV7qaWYhw VsQiPht9NCZxkG9yVe/sz1J34YtQ8pB/qG2FJ+A7GQd8fjsay3M75UBQ2AJDLLhf CUOuyLCfZySMbdCPzPw4XevpMEsADnOMd6bal5uyUxQ2SvFDR0ub04mDf52p81Cd Qme479L9QJk3gKHzoGBw =uk3n -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----