From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14BC713825A for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 08:21:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62180141E5; Mon, 16 May 2016 08:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BBB5E0857 for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 08:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([85.114.5.42]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MOwY7-1azDUS0Iz9-006L6i for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 10:20:43 +0200 Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 08:20:13 +0000 From: Consus To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/ Message-ID: <20160516082013.GA4036@daphne> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1462655928.66afcab271f65b97330e610040ad3acc1b812a03.hd_brummy@gentoo> <2471981.YXCVhQinPE@localhost> <20160515004812.06969b6e@snowflex> <1556568.JVTqaLWHPB@localhost> <20160516155601.38b0b35e@archtester.homenetwork> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160516155601.38b0b35e@archtester.homenetwork> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:OI9UOjwO8b4oGWxUI3qeDy8BbqhHCV1c3kJ72uMaGtdosuI16uJ KzOiXr/ev03BKAGpKt55KTa6QXsRl7Duk3tOk3XHJjvgy8JuWBVGgeVkoGYHv8V9+dgMvga sb/WBryRPpHdouRODRSEzPMEY1bPJ50NKzGvUKlJIODj/1CsiUu2W9gxP/8SrSWgTwXTfO3 EdhgS/7LfnevUcEqyurJg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:C+6jVNHgejk=:JFDgXo7nUQKNB3vNf4bFa9 ThCH/KSJf8e0e8pGDwZ7FB/CTAbMOb6EslJvqbMvkWir7PzU89nfGC+FvGakQltn4Olx0nGJE Qi03DHh+giwvS/0+KjeAug8ICXtG13rNZ2A0mmVNi+39S1MXenOLEw9+mtPjvoDD0d+h6fmB+ 62rsjqUvJFKazdfV5AmhHObCepX1SOYVhQdC/OdDkYTV6NET5ZOD8IvvW+8HzSGMLIfOc24/6 icDiiRFUmB6pdgOucuxPn2pPFWlq3ELSo9KxvKlL20fM06u0bvEUEsRf2zwYLzrTdWU8q4i+A HCK8Lhn8u9KGIYNXLYHX1223Zf3B0Xa8lo7BubxVTForfcjIufaEMoz0hpNRV2zBe6h7AmLVl GiO01I6765Wnx9tCXuJgNt/TiVlLTVDCsf34rQLjvMEDnL49Nqp16HejGVIHOwileB6RlSbVt 0YflJr0RiaQWACGgI3ehsQpHU2wLio6tsxmqG1jAf9R5GV/lBRVnC6TbINmDGY+EkrEw5EPnR V2HwnshwNzRqt+lJ2WGkNUbvHSJnRy1VtPv/ZfHlJ0nccDNF+RR2alrNRlnzaJF6tvMW3vb52 NSL5Uq/8P2VJz4nHG5j2aUoB+GSXmGKsZ+deyJ7BWH3r/h/Kuv+VGN2CiZpvQhyWCACrOzH9F bCG/fGH4ClasYJ8vWNiRtQ8bSiUu44yJ14jYHkyStOjGLYiQhAZfaaTkTL4B0gED/xYbsjisK 39BYJua5Bj/W8+Hk7BFZlXL8LEfBBkJFIgCO+sObCj/iesCla54fpp/qq/o= X-Archives-Salt: 7c51fda8-bd25-4bb0-a64d-4dbb3a89a5ec X-Archives-Hash: d8f5270b0054420b01f882399ec7b72b On 15:56 Mon 16 May, Ian Delaney wrote: > On Sat, 14 May 2016 21:04:17 -0400 > Rich Freeman wrote: > > I hope I won't regret this > > > On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Aaron Bauman wrote: > > > On Sunday, May 15, 2016 12:48:12 AM JST Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > [...] > > [...] > > [...] > > > > > > Applying that same rationale, it would be unfair to say that an > > > undescribed level of professionalism in communication is required > > > as well. Nothing here violates the CoC. > > > > > > > No but it violates elements simply lot listed in the CoC. DO we need a > better CoC? You need a better pair of balls; there is a chance that you will stop getting offended by random emails.