From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA7459CAF for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 17:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A967A21C028; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 17:19:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F3FB21C003 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 17:19:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aowXz-00055v-Hr for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 19:19:47 +0200 Received: from 108-248-189-27.lightspeed.clmasc.sbcglobal.net ([108.248.189.27]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 19:19:47 +0200 Received: from boxcars by 108-248-189-27.lightspeed.clmasc.sbcglobal.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 19:19:47 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: =?UTF-8?B?wrtRwqs=?= Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: usr merge Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:18:25 -0500 Organization: none Message-ID: <20160409121825.7739c5fc@sepulchrave.remarqs> References: <57087E0D.3090502@gmail.com> <20160409053230.GA16529@waltdnes.org> <20160409160938.GA17530@waltdnes.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 108-248-189-27.lightspeed.clmasc.sbcglobal.net X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.29; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: d6979cf9-5cd7-43ee-b2da-30b29dbf0bd3 X-Archives-Hash: 04185a422d77a7e5cebcd19a26a9729a On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:09:38 -0400 waltdnes@waltdnes.org wrote: > On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 07:11:31AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote > > > It was simply a recognition that we were already in a state where > > booting a system without /usr mounted early can cause problems. > > For certain edge cases... yes. But they were already using > initramfs or merging /usr into /. I'm talking about the 95% who > don't really need it. Booting without /usr mounted early is something Gentoo already doesn't support and can't support, right?