From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 00/21] gen_usr_ldscript: migrate away from a sep-/usr by default
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 12:35:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160402173558.GA620@linux1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31b4e590-44b6-44e4-b3ab-32b3f891f3dc@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1920 bytes --]
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 09:36:56PM +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Friday, April 1, 2016 8:33:02 PM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 01 Apr 2016 20:00, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >> On Friday, April 1, 2016 3:58:18 AM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>>> ...
> >>> "being supported" != "enabled by default". so no, i still don't see any
> >>> requirement in anything you've cited that this be turned on
> >>> by default. ...
> >>
> >> you're right, but you know, before you claimed the contrary of what was
> >> voted and then decided to argue whether a 4 years old council decision
> >> applies or not here, my point was, and still is, that such council
> >> decisions make me think you're confusing what *you* want and
> >> what *we* (as
> >> a project) want for this case
> >
> > i see no significant number of people clamoring for this as the default.
> > the bug that started this has everyone on board for changing the default.
>
> yes; I also tend to think fedora's usr move is what makes most sense
> nowadays, but that'd go against council
No, it wouldn't. We made a decision in 2013 (I'll have to find it) that
separate /usr should only be supported via initramfs; there is also a
news item warning that if you are not using initramfs and you have
separate /usr your system will be unbootable in the future.
>
> > it's really no different either from the install process today: a stage3
> > cannot be unpacked & booted directly. a user must configure it before it
> > can actually be used. if that means enabling USE=sep-usr, then so be it.
>
> except it adds yet another step
>
> > there's no reason to force this legacy behavior on the majority of people
> > when a split-/usr is uncommon.
>
> what's the reason not to force it? saving 10kb from ldscripts out of a 1Gb
> typical desktop install ? doesnt seem like a reason for disabling it either
>
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-02 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-30 23:58 [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 00/21] gen_usr_ldscript: migrate away from a sep-/usr by default Mike Frysinger
2016-03-30 23:58 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 01/21] sep-usr.eclass: new eclass to hold gen_usr_ldscript and related logic #417451 Mike Frysinger
2016-03-30 23:58 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 02/21] profiles: mask USE=sep-usr for most systems Mike Frysinger
2016-03-30 23:58 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 03/21] sys-libs/zlib: switch to sep-usr eclass Mike Frysinger
2016-03-30 23:58 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 04/21] sys-libs/pwdb: " Mike Frysinger
2016-03-30 23:58 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 05/21] sys-libs/gpm: " Mike Frysinger
2016-03-30 23:58 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 06/21] app-arch/bzip2: " Mike Frysinger
2016-03-30 23:58 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 07/21] app-arch/xz-utils: " Mike Frysinger
2016-03-30 23:58 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 08/21] sys-apps/acl: " Mike Frysinger
2016-03-30 23:58 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 09/21] sys-apps/attr: " Mike Frysinger
2016-03-30 23:58 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 10/21] sys-libs/pam: " Mike Frysinger
2016-03-30 23:58 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 11/21] dev-libs/lzo: " Mike Frysinger
2016-03-30 23:58 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 12/21] sys-libs/readline: " Mike Frysinger
2016-03-30 23:58 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 13/21] sys-apps/keyutils: " Mike Frysinger
2016-03-30 23:58 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 14/21] dev-libs/libaio: " Mike Frysinger
2016-03-30 23:58 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 15/21] sys-libs/libcap: " Mike Frysinger
2016-03-30 23:58 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 16/21] sys-libs/cracklib: " Mike Frysinger
2016-03-30 23:58 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 17/21] sys-libs/ncurses: " Mike Frysinger
2016-03-30 23:58 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 18/21] dev-libs/libpwquality: " Mike Frysinger
2016-03-30 23:58 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 19/21] dev-libs/libedit: " Mike Frysinger
2016-03-30 23:58 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 20/21] dev-libs/libpcre: " Mike Frysinger
2016-03-30 23:58 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 21/21] sys-apps/tcp-wrappers: " Mike Frysinger
2016-03-31 14:05 ` [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 00/21] gen_usr_ldscript: migrate away from a sep-/usr by default Alexis Ballier
2016-03-31 16:07 ` Mike Frysinger
2016-03-31 17:00 ` Alexis Ballier
2016-03-31 18:19 ` Mike Frysinger
2016-03-31 19:09 ` Alexis Ballier
2016-04-01 1:58 ` Mike Frysinger
2016-04-01 18:00 ` Alexis Ballier
2016-04-01 18:33 ` Mike Frysinger
2016-04-01 19:36 ` Alexis Ballier
2016-04-02 17:35 ` William Hubbs [this message]
2016-04-02 18:01 ` William Hubbs
2016-04-04 7:12 ` Alexis Ballier
2016-04-04 22:59 ` [gentoo-dev] /usr merge Was: " Duncan
2016-03-31 14:12 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Gilbert
2016-03-31 16:08 ` Mike Frysinger
2016-03-31 17:03 ` Alexis Ballier
2016-03-31 18:20 ` Mike Frysinger
2016-03-31 19:13 ` Alexis Ballier
2016-04-01 1:56 ` Mike Frysinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160402173558.GA620@linux1 \
--to=williamh@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox