public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-dev] Re: BROKEN: repository became broken!
       [not found] <201603301432.u2UEW4qU014975@ns1.bonedaddy.net>
@ 2016-03-30 14:52 ` Patrick Lauer
  2016-03-30 15:03   ` Brian Dolbec
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Lauer @ 2016-03-30 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: mgorny; +Cc: gentoo-automated-testing, gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

On 03/30/2016 04:32 PM, mgorny@bonedaddy.net wrote:
> Looks like someone just broke Gentoo!
>
> New issues:
> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/33f062a/output.html#dev-db/aerospike-server-community
>
>
> Introduced by commits:
> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=54033c5
>
>
> Changes since last check:
> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/?qt=range&q=0d2b3ad..54033c5
>
> --
> Gentoo repository CI
... can you please either use repoman like everyone else, or fix repoman
to match the behaviour you like?

'cause it's annoying to have repoman say all is well and then get such a
nice response. Hard to comply with rules if there's no good way to check
the rules.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: BROKEN: repository became broken!
  2016-03-30 14:52 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: BROKEN: repository became broken! Patrick Lauer
@ 2016-03-30 15:03   ` Brian Dolbec
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Brian Dolbec @ 2016-03-30 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Patrick Lauer
  Cc: mgorny, gentoo-automated-testing, gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:52:13 +0200
Patrick Lauer <patrick@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On 03/30/2016 04:32 PM, mgorny@bonedaddy.net wrote:
> > Looks like someone just broke Gentoo!
> >
> > New issues:
> > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/33f062a/output.html#dev-db/aerospike-server-community
> >
> >
> > Introduced by commits:
> > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=54033c5
> >
> >
> > Changes since last check:
> > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/?qt=range&q=0d2b3ad..54033c5
> >
> > --
> > Gentoo repository CI  
> ... can you please either use repoman like everyone else, or fix
> repoman to match the behaviour you like?
> 
> 'cause it's annoying to have repoman say all is well and then get
> such a nice response. Hard to comply with rules if there's no good
> way to check the rules.
> 
> 

Yeah, it would be nice to have a final resolution to the
metadataDTD ==> xmlshema change so the repoman metadata module can get
a proper re-write.

In the meantime, repoman can not detect the recent change to the
maintainer field.

-- 
Brian Dolbec <dolsen>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-03-30 15:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <201603301432.u2UEW4qU014975@ns1.bonedaddy.net>
2016-03-30 14:52 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: BROKEN: repository became broken! Patrick Lauer
2016-03-30 15:03   ` Brian Dolbec

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox