From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C721388C0 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:35:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B23B21C019; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25CFEE0818 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:35:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dra13-4-78-234-166-189.fbx.proxad.net [78.234.166.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: aballier) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E892633BEF8 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:35:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:35:12 +0100 From: Alexis Ballier To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Message-ID: <20160226143512.743794b6@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: References: <56B85B06.7020500@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.29; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: aa922d99-8b61-4215-b71c-4d7bbf13c33e X-Archives-Hash: bb09e126eb99ed3fdbe48ad0908a1b51 On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:31:28 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:08 AM, Patrick Lauer > wrote: > > Ohey, > > > > I've opened a bug at: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573922 > > > > The idea here is to change the order of the providers of > > virtual/udev. For existing installs this has zero impact. > > For stage3 this would mean that eudev is pulled in instead of udev. > > > > Since this has utterly stalled and private emails were also unable to > resolve the deadlock I have requested a council decision one way or > the other: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=575718 > > Most likely we'll issue one before the next meeting. There is no need > to regurgitate this thread. If somebody has something NEW to say feel > free, but we'll make a decision one way or another soon. I think it'd be nice to have a summary of all the arguments used against or for switching the default