From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC261388C0 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 22:17:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AE9521C01E; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 22:17:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A33521C007 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 22:17:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from professor-x (S010634bdfa9ecf80.vc.shawcable.net [96.49.31.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dolsen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3955E340DAD for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 22:17:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:16:48 -0800 From: Brian Dolbec To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bug #565566: Why is it still not fixed? Message-ID: <20160224141648.1895be55.dolsen@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20160224211613.51a613ff@gentp.lnet> References: <56CC937C.3030805@gentoo.org> <56CCD4DC.3040509@gentoo.org> <56CCFE65.5050201@gentoo.org> <20160224211613.51a613ff@gentp.lnet> Organization: Gentoo Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/dcJvifSm5gBR8.S._7kGiDR"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 7409277a-305f-4a93-b136-e8e0929bb920 X-Archives-Hash: 3eba1fe0da6201712ff145df7e9bdd66 --Sig_/dcJvifSm5gBR8.S._7kGiDR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:16:13 +0100 Luis Ressel wrote: > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:18:55 -0800 > Raymond Jennings wrote: >=20 > > As far as changelog generation, what about causing the changelogs to > > be autogenerated by the end user's computer? Divide and conquer. =20 >=20 > That would require a local git clone. And that's exactly what those > who still want Changelogs are trying to avoid. >=20 Not only that, but their generation along with thick manifests are already quite resource intensive and time consuming for a relatively high powered server (a big reason behind this thread). Now make some older users system or low powered arm system do that with much lower resources and you are talking about a long time for completion. --=20 Brian Dolbec --Sig_/dcJvifSm5gBR8.S._7kGiDR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.1 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWzivQXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRBNUQ3Qzc0RTA4MUNDNzBEQjRBNEFBRjVG QkJEMDg3Mjc1ODIwRUQ4AAoJEPu9CHJ1gg7YX4gP/2l8wyLRwuNL3mcXzpvzL6L4 UlZjDpkL6RlwnGAYEbSZ+WfJKeYzXxAOhjsi3tUQ4hUy3U7Wvz6GfbWnYk7bjbP3 GJKXQmq1agONivQ86L0iJiPkbrQGJRWyXmap99ldOfdD9Ff7s1gbo33xnTEAKJi1 1Oh06cbXjPMNNoc/RYyJIXYosG/P+K9w4AUxadt829KcRrK2oEHnwxgat8/JpVlY gDfrR98IQ4UHyszvBIx2It86HjwlidSYhYuwzKxk1bkmZOS/ssSbn6WtnQf9EouO 0LnQw5UjNb9alp3YAoIZ3cHBFFX3yQ/GiCcrGb0cQF6b5Eq91377ZffMgEy7kESF N7seKdu28dfvE+LvZnYfqIyJJj7Tu/WMQwy5DunfD0uMDeaROmyUVypX0FwJBr9J qvfHbsYryIRykhGKWk/OQljMk/l5xpgMo1iDUNcw/UQfUf4OLgM2xLXWiLLT2dvA slaQv0fVGiqVJJ4vPvrdGQFNWqT58MejUVM0MOAjKwC3ZdqTc1iEd4Eijmry4NDH nfk6qnWNognKysFixe5F+N+JqO956npigA7KIYN5ONFKVtSovHTvhTcXQx/lqmuM tPkIN90w0dBQRqkE3JT9RdQz3eE2yM0goa+WJ4wBOUT5sNmyoU01grv6Yn5NuQgW CbFdJR+Gnp73u4Vjip7t =YXU3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/dcJvifSm5gBR8.S._7kGiDR--