From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003A8138010 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 05:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5DA2121C01F; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 05:28:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CEC021C002 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 05:28:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 10174340FB3 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 05:28:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:28:52 -0500 From: Mike Frysinger To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Message-ID: <20160215052852.GM7732@vapier.lan> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <56C099EE.8020401@gentoo.org> <20160214114131.62b2deb8.dolsen@gentoo.org> <20160214202326.GE7732@vapier.lan> <56C0E6BD.5010406@gentoo.org> <20160214204751.GH7732@vapier.lan> <56C0EA0F.20802@gentoo.org> <20160215021630.GL7732@vapier.lan> <56C13880.2070303@iee.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Xqa6BLk9/BAwVQKe" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56C13880.2070303@iee.org> X-Archives-Salt: 5078aab9-d683-4636-8c8d-10eb4dfe4779 X-Archives-Hash: 7f7246559d3ac6eda67807ff9968f83a --Xqa6BLk9/BAwVQKe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On 15 Feb 2016 02:31, M. J. Everitt wrote: > I think people are confusing the fact that there IS no separate 'udev' i'm fully aware of this fact and have been since it happened. i don't think it changes my point. -mike --Xqa6BLk9/BAwVQKe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWwWIUAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBy+oQAJg9Bqzr7wKUECSRhEqohVx4 rVoqsqEk6AEKTo8OPAH/ETcrKx/O2fF9fLZRSMfhtENr3BYtVPlzuwSOdysvVXaI wBT6s+GEZi0L+Kk1nAl7UpjS82KiKv2Y7rJnaTL2cNUyPQ97msQen93hQdkFj/W5 V4cWaw6r1ea3vn0ynKYlcOGw8Pd6XnT86N7CQZKqpMid4nd3a42TTv4/I5xCy19+ zb8/s0OGTOxrMpwnZdpDVdlVmDRJOKSHcclHF7RSlz8+hMXfqZ2Vu7gZvOV0Z+Yb kgaPCn6tu03y47ZN9trr9StRCqzjMzNGdOvmUJZyJdIXmzJQJlmgQbnwJA4S5Yvs nfDczQCsPeKBE8Jd+jC5e3bIbo8PbWoyEAmxAtstVo3YOjTkDKDeipUVgM7I8HHE s30FccWAk5au91QYOcGQqisUXLdfe4eMW14gO3L255mcuejGbF85QcdTKmqITkpD qZO5px4vwzi6jdmQxwfJEDuexeHJCv8GGIQN44WAOrPeZVEgAFZ6ioVGoD6ZUnUf 8n574ryfEjvVTrl0DVr1Zrnv/wQ6gKvjx2SgDMs0Hb6s9Wl6lZvugjFRAkuvl+UG JpzfohimRBGfFBvNu9Zp6jLdYbwOinZUwRilDw0j0yvTZYI7XaeNbMQBU0/TRdGc nMNPYg/Kp2fPcFJZRbjB =quv5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Xqa6BLk9/BAwVQKe--