From: Luis Ressel <aranea@aixah.de>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New USE_EXPAND NGINX_MODULES_STREAM
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 00:33:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160209003354.79f26e34@gentp.lnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAATnKFAcv4q8Wj1EytTN493CFBEvR-n=YSmRu8qR2r-NBEpcgg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 12:22:51 +1300
Kent Fredric <kentfredric@gmail.com> wrote:
> The only way you could make that scheme better is having an early
> stage in NGINX that shows which module are going to be built /based
> on/ the USE flag combinations, and then something with savedconfig
> could potentially bar building certain modules.
>
> > Dependency control : USE flags representing the dep
> > Feature control: SavedConfig
>
> And then the "Feature control" could be tightened up/managed with USE
> flags used more sparingly when things depended on them.
>
That might be useful, if the maintainer is willing to implement it. :)
> The biggest downside of this is the disconnect for a user between
> "What I want" and "What do I have to select to get what I want" ( For
> instance, USE=pcre turning on rewrite support is weird ,
>
Sure, that's why I said these two (image_filter and rewrite) were less
obvious. I agree it'd be better to use a local 'rewrite' USE for the
rewrite module.
> While mgorny is more focused on "Why do I have this dependency" not
> "What feature do I want"
>
> And this of course does nothing for us in regards to the large
> collection of USE controlled SRC_URIs .....
>
Yes, but we have those in other ebuilds, too, most of which don't use
USE_EXPAND. And this thread is supposed to be about the usage of
USE_EXPAND in nginx, right?
> Because NGINX is monolithic, but its sources are aggregated from a
> bunch of different authors for some fun reason, sort of like having a
> `linux-kernel` ebuild with a SRC_URI for every single vendor name (
> *barf* )
>
> I really do not envy the nginx maintainer.
>
Me neither. @mrueg or whoever's the maintainer: Thanks for sparing the
rest of us from this insanity. :)
Regards,
Luis Ressel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-08 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-03 22:29 [gentoo-dev] New USE_EXPAND NGINX_MODULES_STREAM Manuel Rüger
2016-02-03 22:48 ` Michał Górny
2016-02-04 10:03 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2016-02-04 10:27 ` Jason Zaman
2016-02-04 12:01 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2016-02-04 12:22 ` Alexis Ballier
2016-02-08 21:41 ` Michał Górny
2016-02-08 22:34 ` Kent Fredric
2016-02-08 22:44 ` James Le Cuirot
2016-02-08 22:56 ` Kent Fredric
2016-02-08 22:59 ` Luis Ressel
2016-02-08 23:22 ` Kent Fredric
2016-02-08 23:33 ` Luis Ressel [this message]
2016-02-09 6:37 ` Patrick Lauer
2016-02-09 8:18 ` Luis Ressel
2016-02-08 23:07 ` Luis Ressel
2016-02-04 12:17 ` Kent Fredric
2016-02-04 22:35 ` Gordon Pettey
2016-02-05 6:38 ` Jason Zaman
2016-02-05 11:07 ` Michał Górny
2016-02-06 20:08 ` Matt Turner
2016-02-04 10:14 ` Alexis Ballier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160209003354.79f26e34@gentp.lnet \
--to=aranea@aixah.de \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox