From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6116658973 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 05:00:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79B35E07FA; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 05:00:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99634E076D for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 05:00:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 143683405D5; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 05:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 05:59:57 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc Message-ID: <20160122055957.2cee78ca.mgorny@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20160117205750.74ff6eda.mgorny@gentoo.org> References: <20160117205750.74ff6eda.mgorny@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.29; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/u4v6l_AUGL.7RFj8fSEAeoM"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: a29b67c9-681f-4e67-a822-f232efd9e3b3 X-Archives-Hash: 1ae00ee887309dd4647b26218caf6874 --Sig_/u4v6l_AUGL.7RFj8fSEAeoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:57:50 +0100 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > Hello, everyone. >=20 > The current maintainers of kernel-misc herd so far haven't replied to > our queries. If we don't get any reply in a week, we will be disbanding > it and looking for new maintainers for its packages. >=20 > Is anyone interested in keeping the herd as a whole and maintaining all > of its packages? If nobody replies till 2016-01-24, the herd will be > automatically disbanded and I will be sending a complete list of > packages needing maintainers. >=20 > Packages currently in herd along with their other maintainers: Oh, there's also the three kernel-related eclasses. I think they should to go kernel@ where most of the actual maintainers are. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/u4v6l_AUGL.7RFj8fSEAeoM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWobdSXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2REJCMDdDQzRGMERBRDA2RUEwQUZFNDFC MDdBMUFFQUVGQjQ0NjRFAAoJELB6GurvtEZOB4wP/iHl0GlG68IrLq1Vq3rvJsLC hKqNujw3eF4vjc5bvIwcb1nTQTRrx2lDHPwmi09pW6aXtTnEnQay88puUFcpPEeo GADwyRsUVXpBS5KCi1TSZCDMVxEjDqlB3TRySKKseCqwDhCmwmQZA7AA84v65WYQ q36iFWagNk2laMXOwZL1FCVbO84YVw4Q6Mfu5JJ9YzkDKUVYZ5sCEZLY1jaaSJfY 9pNZ04VXNI+Z4kyk6PGm0g6r670ravnIJ6GHsVg/l0+loJRUgsxFYgYvF7IN4quk N5Ik5rKnWmwlPS+zP7qvvqleR6PeLba3UQKlOoX39WLdQHPQhTCl2OyNLp0JTPYr P6wu2hGJAdFhLF9UORSbrbhWxZwtz5c1BGNQBBunpRLiMIduzAx2dPk3YKBhsibl Eb8JDvo8J/gQPp6N2CvHwJy2X3bSMD4c2m+axwsdkxVl7oh829zEjEE1jPguXMZw cVnpU/tXcsJq1kvLRKLXDv+egYFqp2nnsO0+I4QrfwjZpDzcQKUKadcGKgB51CoX 4XBvr69ImIPu3iOmLAAuv+jI4mK8SMceMaWFDnDsg7PvAaVV9Lahaudn8BhnDWMW vUAlL5ds5jF02XbfHdqyBw0XkTLDdk58BCxsU9g1P0Vekn5RuK9lH1x5XCxGpL6L XO9hUACCyTgrY8+05Q6r =gVDO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/u4v6l_AUGL.7RFj8fSEAeoM--