Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

[Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1668 bytes --]

Hi guys,

On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:40:04 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote:

>On 20 Jan 2016 12:39, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
>> wrote:  
>> > On 18 Jan 2016 00:57, Joshua Kinard wrote:  
>> >> On 01/17/2016 14:57, Michał Górny wrote:  
>> >> > sys-apps/kexec-tools         :  
>> >>
>> >> Better suited for base-system, maybe?
>> >>  
>> >> > sys-fs/jfsutils              :  
>> >>
>> >> Definitely base-system, as xfsprogs is already maintained by
>> >> them.  
>> >
>> > sounds fine for both.  generally fs tools probably should live
>> > under base-system for consistency.  
>> 
>> Nothing wrong with consistency, but I'd prefer a package to be placed
>> under the base-system project because the base-system project members
>> intend to maintain it.  I don't want to see packages placed into
>> projects simply because they're similar to other packages in those
>> projects if it means they'll just be neglected.
>> 
>> I have no idea which is the case here.  If the base-system
>> maintainers want to maintain these two packages, have at it!  If
>> not, leave it as maintainer-needed.  
>
>if base-system@ isn't going to maintain it, we'll punt it from the herd
>-mike

well, I already added myself as maintainer of sys-fs/jfsutils and I
happen to be a base-system maintainer. So goal already reached :)

Kind regards
Lars

-- 
Lars Wendler
Gentoo package maintainer
GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93  9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39

Attention! New gpg key! See (self signed server cert for now)
http://www.gentoofan.org/blog/index.php?/archives/9-New-gpg-keys.html

[-- Attachment #2: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]