[gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

[gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

[Michał Górny]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1274 bytes --]

Hello, everyone.

The current maintainers of kernel-misc herd so far haven't replied to
our queries. If we don't get any reply in a week, we will be disbanding
it and looking for new maintainers for its packages.

Is anyone interested in keeping the herd as a whole and maintaining all
of its packages? If nobody replies till 2016-01-24, the herd will be
automatically disbanded and I will be sending a complete list of
packages needing maintainers.

Packages currently in herd along with their other maintainers:

app-doc/linux-device-drivers : 
app-misc/fdutils             : 
app-misc/zisofs-tools        : 
dev-libs/klibc               : 
sys-apps/kexec-tools         : 
sys-devel/smatch             : toolchain
sys-devel/sparse             : toolchain
sys-fs/avfs                  : proxy-maintainers, pete4abw@comcast.net
sys-fs/ecryptfs-utils        : crypto
sys-fs/fuse                  : radhermit@
sys-fs/jfsutils              : 
sys-fs/lufis                 : 
sys-fs/siefs                 : 
sys-fs/sshfs-fuse            : radhermit@
sys-kernel/linux-docs        : mpagano@
sys-power/cpupower           : ssuominen@, floppym@
sys-process/schedtool        : 


-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 949 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

[Lars Wendler]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1660 bytes --]

Hello list,

I am going to take these packages:

sys-fs/jfsutils
sys-process/schedtool


Kind regards
Lars

On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:57:50 +0100 Michał Górny wrote:

>Hello, everyone.
>
>The current maintainers of kernel-misc herd so far haven't replied to
>our queries. If we don't get any reply in a week, we will be disbanding
>it and looking for new maintainers for its packages.
>
>Is anyone interested in keeping the herd as a whole and maintaining all
>of its packages? If nobody replies till 2016-01-24, the herd will be
>automatically disbanded and I will be sending a complete list of
>packages needing maintainers.
>
>Packages currently in herd along with their other maintainers:
>
>app-doc/linux-device-drivers : 
>app-misc/fdutils             : 
>app-misc/zisofs-tools        : 
>dev-libs/klibc               : 
>sys-apps/kexec-tools         : 
>sys-devel/smatch             : toolchain
>sys-devel/sparse             : toolchain
>sys-fs/avfs                  : proxy-maintainers, pete4abw@comcast.net
>sys-fs/ecryptfs-utils        : crypto
>sys-fs/fuse                  : radhermit@
>sys-fs/jfsutils              : 
>sys-fs/lufis                 : 
>sys-fs/siefs                 : 
>sys-fs/sshfs-fuse            : radhermit@
>sys-kernel/linux-docs        : mpagano@
>sys-power/cpupower           : ssuominen@, floppym@
>sys-process/schedtool        : 
>
>



-- 
Lars Wendler
Gentoo package maintainer
GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93  9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39

Attention! New gpg key! See (self signed server cert for now)
http://www.gentoofan.org/blog/index.php?/archives/9-New-gpg-keys.html

[-- Attachment #2: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

[Joshua Kinard]

On 01/17/2016 14:57, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
> 
> The current maintainers of kernel-misc herd so far haven't replied to
> our queries. If we don't get any reply in a week, we will be disbanding
> it and looking for new maintainers for its packages.
> 
> Is anyone interested in keeping the herd as a whole and maintaining all
> of its packages? If nobody replies till 2016-01-24, the herd will be
> automatically disbanded and I will be sending a complete list of
> packages needing maintainers.
> 
> Packages currently in herd along with their other maintainers:
> 

[snip]

> sys-apps/kexec-tools         : 

Better suited for base-system, maybe?

[snip]

> sys-fs/jfsutils              : 

Definitely base-system, as xfsprogs is already maintained by them.

--J

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1008 bytes --]

On 18 Jan 2016 00:57, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 01/17/2016 14:57, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hello, everyone.
> > 
> > The current maintainers of kernel-misc herd so far haven't replied to
> > our queries. If we don't get any reply in a week, we will be disbanding
> > it and looking for new maintainers for its packages.
> > 
> > Is anyone interested in keeping the herd as a whole and maintaining all
> > of its packages? If nobody replies till 2016-01-24, the herd will be
> > automatically disbanded and I will be sending a complete list of
> > packages needing maintainers.
> > 
> > Packages currently in herd along with their other maintainers:
> > 
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > sys-apps/kexec-tools         : 
> 
> Better suited for base-system, maybe?
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > sys-fs/jfsutils              : 
> 
> Definitely base-system, as xfsprogs is already maintained by them.

sounds fine for both.  generally fs tools probably should live under
base-system for consistency.
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

[Rich Freeman]

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 18 Jan 2016 00:57, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>> On 01/17/2016 14:57, Michał Górny wrote:
>> > sys-apps/kexec-tools         :
>>
>> Better suited for base-system, maybe?
>>
>> > sys-fs/jfsutils              :
>>
>> Definitely base-system, as xfsprogs is already maintained by them.
>
> sounds fine for both.  generally fs tools probably should live under
> base-system for consistency.

Nothing wrong with consistency, but I'd prefer a package to be placed
under the base-system project because the base-system project members
intend to maintain it.  I don't want to see packages placed into
projects simply because they're similar to other packages in those
projects if it means they'll just be neglected.

I have no idea which is the case here.  If the base-system maintainers
want to maintain these two packages, have at it!  If not, leave it as
maintainer-needed.

-- 
Rich

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1139 bytes --]

On 20 Jan 2016 12:39, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On 18 Jan 2016 00:57, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> >> On 01/17/2016 14:57, Michał Górny wrote:
> >> > sys-apps/kexec-tools         :
> >>
> >> Better suited for base-system, maybe?
> >>
> >> > sys-fs/jfsutils              :
> >>
> >> Definitely base-system, as xfsprogs is already maintained by them.
> >
> > sounds fine for both.  generally fs tools probably should live under
> > base-system for consistency.
> 
> Nothing wrong with consistency, but I'd prefer a package to be placed
> under the base-system project because the base-system project members
> intend to maintain it.  I don't want to see packages placed into
> projects simply because they're similar to other packages in those
> projects if it means they'll just be neglected.
> 
> I have no idea which is the case here.  If the base-system maintainers
> want to maintain these two packages, have at it!  If not, leave it as
> maintainer-needed.

if base-system@ isn't going to maintain it, we'll punt it from the herd
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] Re: Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

[Duncan]

Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:40:04 -0500 as excerpted:

> if base-system@ isn't going to maintain it, we'll punt it from the herd
> -mike

Umm, you mean project, right?  Because the whole discussion here is part 
of getting rid of herds.  =:^)

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

[Rich Freeman]

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote:
> Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:40:04 -0500 as excerpted:
>
>> if base-system@ isn't going to maintain it, we'll punt it from the herd
>> -mike
>
> Umm, you mean project, right?  Because the whole discussion here is part
> of getting rid of herds.  =:^)
>

Hey, some of us are still getting used to /usr/portage being the
"Gentoo Repo."  :)

-- 
Rich

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 348 bytes --]

On 20 Jan 2016 19:48, Duncan wrote:
> Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:40:04 -0500 as excerpted:
> > if base-system@ isn't going to maintain it, we'll punt it from the herd
> 
> Umm, you mean project, right?  Because the whole discussion here is part 
> of getting rid of herds.  =:^)

a distinction without a difference
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

[Rich Freeman]

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 20 Jan 2016 19:48, Duncan wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:40:04 -0500 as excerpted:
>> > if base-system@ isn't going to maintain it, we'll punt it from the herd
>>
>> Umm, you mean project, right?  Because the whole discussion here is part
>> of getting rid of herds.  =:^)
>
> a distinction without a difference

And that would be why we're getting rid of them...

-- 
Rich

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

[Joshua Kinard]

On 01/20/2016 14:48, Duncan wrote:
> Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:40:04 -0500 as excerpted:
> 
>> if base-system@ isn't going to maintain it, we'll punt it from the herd
>> -mike
> 
> Umm, you mean project, right?  Because the whole discussion here is part 
> of getting rid of herds.  =:^)
> 

Somewhere in my archives, I have the e-mail proposing the creation of herds.

...

I feel old now.


--J

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

[Lars Wendler]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1668 bytes --]

Hi guys,

On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:40:04 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote:

>On 20 Jan 2016 12:39, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
>> wrote:  
>> > On 18 Jan 2016 00:57, Joshua Kinard wrote:  
>> >> On 01/17/2016 14:57, Michał Górny wrote:  
>> >> > sys-apps/kexec-tools         :  
>> >>
>> >> Better suited for base-system, maybe?
>> >>  
>> >> > sys-fs/jfsutils              :  
>> >>
>> >> Definitely base-system, as xfsprogs is already maintained by
>> >> them.  
>> >
>> > sounds fine for both.  generally fs tools probably should live
>> > under base-system for consistency.  
>> 
>> Nothing wrong with consistency, but I'd prefer a package to be placed
>> under the base-system project because the base-system project members
>> intend to maintain it.  I don't want to see packages placed into
>> projects simply because they're similar to other packages in those
>> projects if it means they'll just be neglected.
>> 
>> I have no idea which is the case here.  If the base-system
>> maintainers want to maintain these two packages, have at it!  If
>> not, leave it as maintainer-needed.  
>
>if base-system@ isn't going to maintain it, we'll punt it from the herd
>-mike

well, I already added myself as maintainer of sys-fs/jfsutils and I
happen to be a base-system maintainer. So goal already reached :)

Kind regards
Lars

-- 
Lars Wendler
Gentoo package maintainer
GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93  9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39

Attention! New gpg key! See (self signed server cert for now)
http://www.gentoofan.org/blog/index.php?/archives/9-New-gpg-keys.html

[-- Attachment #2: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

[Michał Górny]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 835 bytes --]

On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:57:50 +0100
Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Hello, everyone.
> 
> The current maintainers of kernel-misc herd so far haven't replied to
> our queries. If we don't get any reply in a week, we will be disbanding
> it and looking for new maintainers for its packages.
> 
> Is anyone interested in keeping the herd as a whole and maintaining all
> of its packages? If nobody replies till 2016-01-24, the herd will be
> automatically disbanded and I will be sending a complete list of
> packages needing maintainers.
> 
> Packages currently in herd along with their other maintainers:

Oh, there's also the three kernel-related eclasses. I think they should
to go kernel@ where most of the actual maintainers are.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 949 bytes --]