From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F551384B4 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 18:59:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A189A21C038; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 18:59:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from foo.stuge.se (foo.stuge.se [212.116.89.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A078E0871 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 18:59:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13971 invoked by uid 501); 21 Dec 2015 18:59:39 -0000 Message-ID: <20151221185939.13970.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:59:39 +0100 From: Peter Stuge To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: repo/gentoo.git, or how committing is challenging Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <566DACB3.2010105@gentoo.org> <20151213222001.0c1c466a3f3b8b0b53c69a9d@gentoo.org> <20151213190045.1e186781.dolsen@gentoo.org> <20151220212127.6e5cd419@caribou.gateway.pace.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ubuMVesmirrCclZT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151220212127.6e5cd419@caribou.gateway.pace.com> X-Archives-Salt: 90d2d4b4-ad8e-478d-ae31-a6d31da5b6c3 X-Archives-Hash: 87d7cbfc12541cc60d1f4a61417fd611 --ubuMVesmirrCclZT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Ryan Hill wrote: > You want me to use a potentially unstable live ebuild instead? > Well, no, that's not gonna happen. Are you demanding that someone else produces for you, and refusing to do anything but consume? If the stable version is broken and if needing to use ~ or live is not up to your standards then why not help roll the next stable version? Help solve the problem instead of complaining. Everyone will benefit. Thanks for your contributions to Gentoo - past and future! //Peter --ubuMVesmirrCclZT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFWeEwbhR3Q0dhIfEgRAkhsAJ9+RGI4E3NDvVNLPpbE4sjKL0Xv5gCfTUTt JCB1sl/qif/EBIzIXgz4B/w= =Wtjv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ubuMVesmirrCclZT--