public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: converting copyright/license information in OpenRC
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 14:24:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151215192422.GC11489@vapier.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151215153136.GA5978@whubbs1.gaikai.biz>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1856 bytes --]

On 15 Dec 2015 09:31, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:05:07AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 11 Dec 2015 14:16, Patrick McLean wrote:
> > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:37:48 -0600 William Hubbs wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 09:04:47PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > >>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, William Hubbs wrote:  
> > > > >   
> > > > Well, the OpenRC project is currently inconsistent about this, so the
> > > > intention is to make it consistent.
> > > > 
> > > >  The .c/.h files have file-scope licenses, but that isn't true for
> > > >  everything in the project.
> > > > 
> > > > I am willing to make the effort to do this, I was just wondering if
> > > > there are any legal pitfalls I need to worry about.
> > > > 
> > > > My theory is I can probably use git to find out who all of the authors
> > > > are, and generate an Authors list from that information and from
> > > > looking at copyright notices.
> > > 
> > > One concern about this is the possibility of copied code. If OpenRC
> > > ever copied code from other BSD licensed projects, then dropping the
> > > notice from the top of the file would be a violation of the upstream
> > > license.
> > 
> > OpenRC isn't purely Gentoo copyright, so it's already a violation.
> > the majority of entries belong to Roy.
> 
> I have no idea what you mean by "it's already a violation", and I'm not
> sure what Gentoo Copyright has to do with it.

your description sounds like you want to run:
  s/Copyright .*/Copyright OpenRC Authors/

i'm saying you can't do that

> Altering Copyright statements to try to claim Gentoo copyright would
> definitely be a violation, but that's not what I'm wanting to do.

adding multiple entries isn't a problem and in fact could/should be done
in most openrc files at this time
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-15 19:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-11 15:39 [gentoo-dev] converting copyright/license information in OpenRC William Hubbs
2015-12-11 20:04 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ulrich Mueller
2015-12-11 21:37   ` William Hubbs
2015-12-11 22:16     ` Patrick McLean
2015-12-12 17:43       ` William Hubbs
2015-12-15  5:05       ` Mike Frysinger
2015-12-15 15:31         ` William Hubbs
2015-12-15 19:24           ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2015-12-15 19:37             ` William Hubbs
2015-12-15 19:48               ` Mike Frysinger
2015-12-16 11:43               ` Alexander Berntsen
2015-12-16 12:39                 ` Rich Freeman
2015-12-16 13:54                   ` Alexander Berntsen
2015-12-16 15:31                     ` Rich Freeman
2015-12-16 16:48                       ` William Hubbs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151215192422.GC11489@vapier.lan \
    --to=vapier@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox