From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9528D1384B4 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 21:53:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 704CF21C057; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 21:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63AA621C002 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 21:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [91.246.99.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bircoph) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8DE334097F for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 21:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:53:22 +0300 From: Andrew Savchenko To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] repo/gentoo.git, or how committing is challenging Message-Id: <20151214005322.55927cc0896a6d49f8e80217@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: References: <566DACB3.2010105@gentoo.org> <20151213222001.0c1c466a3f3b8b0b53c69a9d@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.3 (GTK+ 2.24.20; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA512"; boundary="Signature=_Mon__14_Dec_2015_00_53_22_+0300_XfBgJ5Sb=lbJvJan" X-Archives-Salt: e1063cef-5764-4fe2-b2a2-8b7441a98295 X-Archives-Hash: c55ba465407b147136dc5560bfc46506 --Signature=_Mon__14_Dec_2015_00_53_22_+0300_XfBgJ5Sb=lbJvJan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 16:30:06 -0500 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Andrew Savchenko wr= ote: > >> Since signing is mandatory since the git migration, ahem, this means > >> that no one in the last 5 months(!) actually followed the documentation > >> (because that does NOT work!). I'm almost impressed, but, wow, this is > >> enterprisey. > > > > It is absolutely possible to create correct gpg key, put it into > > LDAP according to GLEP and to sign commits and pushes properly. >=20 > If gkeys is as broken as Patrick describes, it might be helpful to > have step-by-step instructions for manually generating an appropriate > key. This would help new developers. GLEP 63 already contains detailed instructions of how to do this: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:63#Specifications_for_GnuPG_keys New devs only have to run $ gpg --gen-key follow instructions from GLEP 63, and upload key using $ gpgp --send-key $key_id Best regards, Andrew Savchenko --Signature=_Mon__14_Dec_2015_00_53_22_+0300_XfBgJ5Sb=lbJvJan Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWbejSAAoJEPZTWjO6HuSNnesP/R48sIoUemLYtPxcaweIM3HJ QurmhoZmKL01LgKcgaazTGQFI3PI9IFkdmwV3cmQFNOrmP499uo7KsrQJDUbdI3i bXaJ5bwqjRES2Vxw5YbA70N/8KPCadwX936ILAbPa10LCarjICMgqdX+l92hTBAw PRC3Uw97KNoArPx5VwZOhWK+81bn+OJNQK0TLF9pw5wAVBrqQ/UgJJhSRmXgpA8W OTfxeTpMTCxdHnKljNood+86vbh3E2HNlMrFAivp7oKXQ7p8TqbxFo8l13Q+5+/s d9vd+ZPxbPX9Io+w0yXiqdjEiOO8KOeE+90AqPx8JWT6HK+YkW0pMfzd9uxi6ZPd 7k/E9KyNBluzqzWheQ8FZTPJI6wBWwMw5/DQmhI+0f0SQIZoaXmBLySxI29fPs3r 6ZT4Dg67iV9wdoiCZwSWXKWtZt/FI46RAIAYDAUYSAlSP4vSoX4ShWmr70uz15J/ ZLsC8Pp0Orokm9eKMDiBoohJ1OtN+7NnGAjaN7zqGN+e2OFnanyY3PXYi4yIrGJZ FiLnKkmlaUjnr6U1fZgFfQrWX8jkSbR0moN2978G/gvTz+ihb5TpTfaw5YW02RNE VlQ4od0IZRXyX1hYIwS4V0b0b2eSxlInGiF5N5Df36R2eET3wYwGe2/T1IavqhTC JMnMTFc99DXnkeVwRvQe =iJV+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Mon__14_Dec_2015_00_53_22_+0300_XfBgJ5Sb=lbJvJan--