From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362B11384B4 for ; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 20:31:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8705721C0C8; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 20:31:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de [81.169.146.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D85A21C070 for ; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 20:31:13 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcyy9p4roSnp5yQo4oJ5cg== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from pinacolada.localnet (88-133-183-17.hsi.glasfaser-ostbayern.de [88.133.183.17]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 37.14 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id y0520drBCKV9XHZ (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (curve secp521r1 with 521 ECDH bits, eq. 15360 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate); Sat, 12 Dec 2015 21:31:09 +0100 (CET) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 09/15] perl-module.eclass: Use DIST_ prefix instead of MODULE_ prefix in EAPI=6 for control variables. Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 21:31:09 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.2.3; KDE/4.14.14; x86_64; ; ) Cc: =?utf-8?q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= References: <201512112201.15354.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <1449867791-30513-9-git-send-email-dilfridge@gentoo.org> <6EECC416-8F0B-4192-B3E7-F275B0F89665@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <6EECC416-8F0B-4192-B3E7-F275B0F89665@gentoo.org> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201512122131.09443.dilfridge@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: 4c7c29f8-6373-4a5d-b5a8-8314aa8e3edd X-Archives-Hash: 51123a434d63ef8f52710c0b6f50600d -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Am Samstag, 12. Dezember 2015, 13:01:58 schrieb Michał Górny: > Dnia 11 grudnia 2015 22:03:05 CET, dilfridge@gentoo.org napisał(a): > > Now that's confusing history. You introduce new variables, document them > all, then suddenly rename then. Wouldn't it be better to rename old ones > first and introduce new ones directly with correct names? Yes. This is what I meant with squashing commits. Basically for now I just kept things along my line of thought, but some of these single patches can be consolidated once the finetuning is done. - -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.1 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWbIQNXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ0RkJDMzI0NjNBOTIwMDY5MTQ2NkMzNDBF MTM4NkZEN0VGNEI1Nzc5AAoJEOE4b9fvS1d5kTwP/A2/8Xro7h/NApFUOEx90Uz4 XMaRk0bh9XtzLB03Wait4ozxV06qOuNDB9iC99uZMZB4plqmegybPatotaaRlDhA 1StUJk0qfU8KYR3D2EHTsHZb80R9AYWNDwKSnK3c2VbHV0zPxoB0DSTL1ncCyhho MGwzHOxVXx34o3fNFTaOtm3N0aIIz5eKmqQ5HQpH+CoZrSiFQqYeK3gOANkQCmuc 4j/FYl7yzdTReqifELzmBc62qUFjZET4QBEhq4tKSHPtOc6uJSXmUbwvRj8t3suG CGZeWvq8i1CspaQrjIpfhz6MyHjxZ7tVLdC94RkM2OH9brwGO6TUl6lEZKOEDz9J jNZf30sxnCpQ6ICnM0olCMnPdpOcfSTWhzl7PSJu3hIT5nMAbgh7PHry/Rz0T2nw eP7izpSK6d1j3djf3Z0W9CQkrNjSohEa4xX6PIj/UFM8xHQ5F0ajihmMGb9gTdFI Gh/JX0c1Q+vM8+9H3oSRvYNgwH1sOCeCBDYFdFwHxeDGNSWufo4xmhIrqJ1YTY81 n87vGc/QLB1d/f92WzDMDNI/WqN0odd+6rYpYE6SFAERZ+XrQXcN1uukbMzMAazd qHgeLmMpdWxoe3RQygGdh5/xFFc6PzdrDo5OrpuUtMcE4mKGzrPjwohobDU2QhsW SYOuaMjXnSCc9+EpO31O =CLg4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----