From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-73549-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627281384B4
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon,  7 Dec 2015 05:38:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42C3821C0BA;
	Mon,  7 Dec 2015 05:37:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53E2A21C01A
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  7 Dec 2015 05:37:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2404:e800:e600:38b:5cd4:584d:8575:cd49])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: perfinion)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1A18340545
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  7 Dec 2015 05:37:55 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 13:37:50 +0800
From: Jason Zaman <perfinion@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: Replacement for versionator.eclass in PMS (for
 EAPI 7?)
Message-ID: <20151207053750.GA23517@meriadoc>
References: <22106.6463.805834.391338@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <22106.6463.805834.391338@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Archives-Salt: bfb31eef-b31f-4262-9948-edabffd455f3
X-Archives-Hash: 99a71072b3bb0887e6118cc25c4d4d8d

On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 10:14:39PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Questions:
> 1. Will these three functions be sufficient, or have we overlooked
>    anything important?

Can we also have get_version_component_count() in there?

I have a package that likes to change the number of parts so I need to
know how many parts before I can split it up.

Basically this:
if [[ $(get_version_component_count) -eq 6 ]]; then
	STUDIO_V=$(get_version_component_range 1-4)
	BUILD_V=$(get_version_component_range 5-6)
else
	STUDIO_V=$(get_version_component_range 1-3)
	BUILD_V=$(get_version_component_range 4-5)
fi

-- Jason