From: James Le Cuirot <chewi@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [EAPI 7] Cross-compile improvements (BDEPEND, BROOT, sysroot)
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 23:32:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151203233254.339b1ed6@symphony.aura-online.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449130978.14754.49.camel@infinera.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2099 bytes --]
On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 08:22:01 +0000
Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@infinera.com> wrote:
> > There's also a further complication here that I forgot to mention to
> > mgorny. While calling configure with --with-sysroot certainly helps,
> > it still stumbles on a significant number of packages that do
> > relinking at the end of the build if elibtoolize hasn't been called.
> > elibtoolize has long patched ltmain.sh with
> > ELT-patches/cross/link-ROOT
>
> I looked at ELT-patches/cross/link-ROOT and it has
> --- libltdl/config/ltmain.sh 2008-09-07 19:56:33.000000000
> +0200 +++ libltdl/config/ltmain.sh.new 2009-02-15
> 20:37:47.000000000 +0100 @@ -5768,7 +5768,7 @@
> test "$hardcode_direct_absolute" = no; then
> add="$libdir/$linklib"
> elif test "$hardcode_minus_L" = yes; then
> - add_dir="-L$libdir"
> + add_dir="-L$ROOT/$libdir"
> add="-l$name"
> elif test "$hardcode_shlibpath_var" = yes; then
> case :$finalize_shlibpath: in
> @@ -5785,7 +5785,7 @@
> fi
> else
> # We cannot seem to hardcode it, guess we'll fake it.
> - add_dir="-L$libdir"
> + add_dir="-L$ROOT/$libdir"
>
> I think this should be "add_dir=-L$lt_sysroot$libdir" rather than
> ROOT. See also bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=521184
> and since I think this is also a libool bug there is a post upstream
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2015-10/msg00012.html
> This has not gotten any attention from upstream libtool folks. Would
> be great if someone more could push for such a change.
Agreed. I already wondered if there was an autotools variable that
would be more appreciate. Since aballier also said that this should be
corrected, I'll see about doing that in conjunction with these changes.
I wouldn't hold your breath for upstream. I've heard of them ignoring
other issues like the "as-needed" one for years.
--
James Le Cuirot (chewi)
Gentoo Linux Developer
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 951 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-03 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-01 22:58 [gentoo-dev] [EAPI 7] Cross-compile improvements (BDEPEND, BROOT, sysroot) James Le Cuirot
2015-12-02 11:40 ` Alexis Ballier
2015-12-02 23:20 ` James Le Cuirot
2015-12-03 8:28 ` Alexis Ballier
2015-12-06 21:05 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2015-12-06 21:15 ` James Le Cuirot
2015-12-07 13:47 ` Alexis Ballier
2015-12-15 5:27 ` Mike Frysinger
2015-12-03 8:22 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2015-12-03 23:32 ` James Le Cuirot [this message]
2015-12-04 7:14 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2015-12-03 16:21 ` Guilherme Amadio
2015-12-05 19:00 ` Gregory M. Turner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151203233254.339b1ed6@symphony.aura-online.co.uk \
--to=chewi@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox