From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DCC21384B4 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 17:37:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6075021C09F; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 17:37:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65D0D21C07E for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 17:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [100.42.103.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: williamh) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE2F93408DD for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 17:37:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 11:36:51 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo development Subject: [gentoo-dev] rfc: OpenRC public API definition Message-ID: <20151203173651.GA16562@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo development Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Archives-Salt: 6a313297-8f30-4461-bfb5-9b1f97f122f5 X-Archives-Hash: 97663dc0a851a7408d023b16ead085d4 --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline All, I would like opinions on what is considered the public api of librc. 1) All definitions in rc.h, even though they are not formally documented in man pages. 2) the definitions in rc.h which are documented in section 3 man pages. I'm bringing this up, because I am looking at redesigning one of the undocumented functions soon, and the redesign will definitely break things if people are using the function outside of OpenRC. Thoughts? William --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlZgfbMACgkQblQW9DDEZTh2+wCgmjy0GYQR54qet/87jUV1/m/C VsMAn3huNyia5P5PTYZmQ0G4O07mofKJ =gwmG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--