From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE5A1384B4 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 06:28:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0C5E21C052; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 06:28:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C34E1E08CD for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 06:28:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-251.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.251]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B48D533E01A; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 06:28:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 07:28:21 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: Peter Stuge Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: Replacement for versionator.eclass in PMS (for EAPI 7?) Message-ID: <20151130072821.4bcf106e.mgorny@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20151129232302.18293.qmail@stuge.se> References: <22106.6463.805834.391338@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20151129232302.18293.qmail@stuge.se> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/K4.xcfYLMSIcO63DzeC5Jc_"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: fb51f1fd-8dd2-45ad-a568-361a31bd5776 X-Archives-Hash: 472ca7bdbabfe9ccd909c0b7a1a1db83 --Sig_/K4.xcfYLMSIcO63DzeC5Jc_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:23:02 +0100 Peter Stuge wrote: > Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > 1. Will these three functions be sufficient, or have we overlooked > > anything important? =20 >=20 > Something that comes to mind as probably being semi-frequent is to > transform a version number component into a Gentoo -p number. >=20 > Or do you suggest doing that by replacing the separator? Yep, separator replacement can do that easily. RHS can be any string. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/K4.xcfYLMSIcO63DzeC5Jc_ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWW+yFXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2REJCMDdDQzRGMERBRDA2RUEwQUZFNDFC MDdBMUFFQUVGQjQ0NjRFAAoJELB6GurvtEZOfuQQAJdj7YS8gn4sb9VYpVg38cCq 4FN3sujuvclfEmdpQXFC0nNgYAXs/G7m6EGwuyUDcbztcl+MCr4LN+y4JxG2mlw6 dbCe0hwqVUS+VTUqjUu8tvF8NHsYwrNDtc82CRXuMVOV8aoRG7ILM+S5FBaG85VX gvNzw6/d5xxp3SFuhDxzAhwWGWJgH92VFgyakuGpkDjeYrfp+2fgnYgDBHbu7mJl rPNcna0lXyyCsC105S6rxnU0UgKJTqnrGISvqg65zcLXdPE9cmG0fJgDZCUf8NCx 86nw8kv5oqF3xh0pGsllkNsZO9qoaIEq7iUAiI3KmPy3n15xqy+ic+HZ+eZ95yIU 53Lw1/I47yI/uZVtApkzf7XJAsnskZ8AD+yGQoeDZP/jltYKo6Aq1LhhFj0Air8m DkzNw7R4E0MumOGzUCzUVVn+5C+wMDVS8IiAr2VUYxlE3lN7bYhRgNnjdN77SaMc b4F3mpdDXpnj6XXi3HkpTHwxllPfnVXiZPxOVJJuHluqxl8ASA9OlYxQ7YqK31Hj yUYGSJ0Ab3avdpMPuI5D/N7X9Qfs/maaDVowdGdYam5mdYpnDP9A7kKyd/oJTrIu msF7eXj1yaaVKxsUUqc5gSuU/yM+1Y8AJIow1EmhnHgkAvX/XMlEsTNwbCh5hq70 bEmrsdTQkrKPxui+xyG8 =WXSE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/K4.xcfYLMSIcO63DzeC5Jc_--