From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18841384B4 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:37:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0646E21C05B; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from foo.stuge.se (foo.stuge.se [212.116.89.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D871021C053 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22252 invoked by uid 501); 26 Nov 2015 16:37:40 -0000 Message-ID: <20151126163740.22251.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:37:40 +0100 From: Peter Stuge To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: adding sbin directories to PATH for all users Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20151125171011.GA8731@whubbs1.ad.gaikai.biz> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: 03b4c22e-a207-4594-8499-5bf1a50834c9 X-Archives-Hash: 48b2e37b04c0f94ba1053e64d77002d9 Mike Gilbert wrote: > > I would like for us to discuss adding the sbin directories to PATH for > > all users. > > I support this idea. The distinction between bin and sbin is stupid. I support it too FWIW. //Peter