From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907031384B4 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 14:52:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B9CAE0814; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 14:52:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36F71E07FE for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 14:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dra13-4-78-234-166-189.fbx.proxad.net [78.234.166.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: aballier) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE90F340688 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 14:52:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 15:52:32 +0100 From: Alexis Ballier To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: media-video/ffmpeg/ Message-ID: <20151120155232.3fe6c9de@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4E6CB6C2-0773-4172-9F2D-714701452FE5@gentoo.org> References: <1447926092.5b2ceba09425a2abaf4a317c38fd2441ef73b272.aballier@gentoo> <20151119232152.0665a34b.mgorny@gentoo.org> <20151120111935.059305bf@gentoo.org> <4E6CB6C2-0773-4172-9F2D-714701452FE5@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: e99a477c-53eb-455f-bd20-e29c0719a341 X-Archives-Hash: 4d55e7c3183cc08f686b45980acdf333 On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 15:26:43 +0100 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > Dnia 20 listopada 2015 11:19:35 CET, Alexis Ballier > napisa=C5=82(a): > >On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 23:21:52 +0100 > >Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > =20 > >> And here you removed the newest version having ~ia64 keyword, =20 > >breaking =20 > >> revdeps: > >>=20 > >> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/1061286/7.html#l885 > >>=20 > >> I suggest you use eshowkw before removing packages. Please fix or > >> revert this. =20 > > > >done; thx for the reminder > > > > > >feel free to revert such commits (at least mine) and send me an email > >so that i get notified something went wrong in the future > > > >PS: can't these checks/emails be automated ? it must be very boring > >to manually track the culprit from ci output =20 >=20 > Not one that I can think of. This usually requires looking at what > changed in both packages, and sometimes profiles. I don't want to > blame wrong people just because someone made an irrelevant commit in > a package. if CI runs after each commit, it should just be a matter of emailing the author when some new breakage appears