From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-73208-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2EC1384B4
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:49:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5AA621C025;
	Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:48:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from foo.stuge.se (foo.stuge.se [212.116.89.98])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80D6321C005
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:48:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 32760 invoked by uid 501); 18 Nov 2015 14:48:49 -0000
Message-ID: <20151118144849.32759.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:48:49 +0100
From: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog - Infra Response; update 2015/11/11,
	potential impact to 30min rsync cycle
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <5636029F.1020304@gentoo.org> <robbat2-20151102T053806-493351483Z@orbis-terrarum.net> <22071.2900.829031.639829@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <robbat2-20151102T195632-919544003Z@orbis-terrarum.net> <20151105125406.3f2053f0@gentoo.org> <robbat2-20151111T224158-905875785Z@orbis-terrarum.net> <20151114170116.11634.qmail@stuge.se>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151114170116.11634.qmail@stuge.se>
X-Archives-Salt: 80622b2b-46a9-47aa-b7c3-2e9ae4a1bd2d
X-Archives-Hash: 22e871148e3d7c7fdd116beed9443d9a

Peter Stuge wrote:
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > However, the largest sticking point, even with parallel threads, is that
> > it seems the base ChangeLog generation is incredibly slow. It averages
> > above 350ms per package right now (at 19k packages in a full cycle, it's
> > a long time), but some packages can take up to 5 seconds so far.
> 
> Which code is doing this generation? Sorry - ENOOVERVIEW. :\

Bump. Does anyone know where I can take a look at this code?


//Peter