From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E5E81384B4 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:50:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2326E07FE; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:50:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93C92E07E6 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz5va-0001xG-UA for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:49:51 +0100 Received: from 108-248-189-27.lightspeed.clmasc.sbcglobal.net ([108.248.189.27]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:49:50 +0100 Received: from boxcars by 108-248-189-27.lightspeed.clmasc.sbcglobal.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:49:50 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: =?UTF-8?B?wrtRwqs=?= Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 6 portage is out! Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:47:33 -0600 Organization: none Message-ID: <20151118104733.73286126@sepulchrave.remarqs> References: <20151117230934.15218644.mgorny@gentoo.org> <564BAE1D.5090103@gentoo.org> <564BCE9E.6050403@gentoo.org> <564BE0CB.3030509@gentoo.org> <22092.10244.685936.324131@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <564C4403.40302@gentoo.org> <22092.23414.863950.329173@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 108-248-189-27.lightspeed.clmasc.sbcglobal.net X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.13.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: 8cd91cba-ad30-49da-9a38-aa965b829b5b X-Archives-Hash: e2f75993cbc45d4b57642c4e8a086f4b On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:05:26 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On 18/11/15 08:25, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> - If you mix stable and unstable then you are by definition an > >> advanced user, who will be able to cope with the situation. :) > Only that there is no real difference to the existing situation when > mixing stable and unstable. It is not guaranteed that all dependencies > of an unstable package are stable, so already now users may have to > accept the ~ keyword for dependencies in some cases. Similarly, such > users may have to accept EAPI 6 for some dependencies, which implies > that they install a package manager supporting EAPI 6. When ~ keywording is needed for dependencies, the PM's output makes it clear what's needed. In cases where EAPI 6 is needed for dependencies but the PM is unaware of EAPI 6, will there be good clues in the PM's output that the PM itself needs to be ~ keyworded?