From: »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 6 portage is out!
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:47:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151118104733.73286126@sepulchrave.remarqs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 22092.23414.863950.329173@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:05:26 +0100
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On 18/11/15 08:25, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >> - If you mix stable and unstable then you are by definition an
> >> advanced user, who will be able to cope with the situation. :)
> Only that there is no real difference to the existing situation when
> mixing stable and unstable. It is not guaranteed that all dependencies
> of an unstable package are stable, so already now users may have to
> accept the ~ keyword for dependencies in some cases. Similarly, such
> users may have to accept EAPI 6 for some dependencies, which implies
> that they install a package manager supporting EAPI 6.
When ~ keywording is needed for dependencies, the PM's output makes it
clear what's needed. In cases where EAPI 6 is needed for dependencies
but the PM is unaware of EAPI 6, will there be good clues in the PM's
output that the PM itself needs to be ~ keyworded?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-18 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-17 22:09 [gentoo-dev] EAPI 6 portage is out! Michał Górny
2015-11-17 22:45 ` Michael Orlitzky
2015-11-17 23:35 ` Mike Gilbert
2015-11-18 1:04 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2015-11-18 2:22 ` Michael Orlitzky
2015-11-18 7:25 ` Ulrich Mueller
2015-11-18 9:25 ` Alexander Berntsen
2015-11-18 9:54 ` Raymond Jennings
2015-11-19 8:13 ` Daniel Campbell
2015-11-18 11:05 ` Ulrich Mueller
2015-11-18 11:12 ` Alexander Berntsen
2015-11-18 11:23 ` Ulrich Mueller
2015-11-18 11:26 ` Alexander Berntsen
2015-11-18 12:01 ` Rich Freeman
2015-11-18 12:06 ` Alexander Berntsen
2015-11-18 12:48 ` Rich Freeman
2015-11-21 4:35 ` Daniel Campbell
2015-11-20 9:39 ` Patrick Lauer
2015-11-20 12:34 ` Rich Freeman
2015-11-21 18:51 ` Andrew Savchenko
2015-11-21 21:00 ` Rich Freeman
2015-11-22 15:54 ` [gentoo-dev] " Michael Palimaka
2015-11-22 16:29 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2015-11-22 16:41 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2015-11-23 7:26 ` Duncan
2015-11-18 15:09 ` [gentoo-dev] " Andreas K. Huettel
2015-11-18 11:59 ` Rich Freeman
2015-11-18 12:00 ` Alexander Berntsen
2015-11-18 15:10 ` Brian Dolbec
2015-11-18 16:47 ` Rich Freeman
2015-11-20 9:27 ` Ian Delaney
2015-11-18 16:47 ` »Q« [this message]
2015-11-18 17:06 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ulrich Mueller
2015-11-18 17:56 ` »Q«
2015-11-18 14:57 ` [gentoo-dev] " Andreas K. Huettel
2015-11-18 18:50 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2015-11-18 19:17 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2015-11-18 1:54 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2015-11-18 3:15 ` Rich Freeman
2015-11-18 1:20 ` [gentoo-dev] " NP-Hardass
2015-11-18 5:10 ` Michał Górny
2015-11-22 8:19 ` [gentoo-dev] " Martin Vaeth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151118104733.73286126@sepulchrave.remarqs \
--to=boxcars@gmx.net \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox