From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-73175-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87F21384B4
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:14:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B97FC21C006;
	Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:14:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA1CE21C001
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:14:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e34:eeaa:6bd0:76d4:35ff:fee6:9e58])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: aballier)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 776DE340686
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:14:16 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 10:14:10 +0100
From: Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in:
 eclass/
Message-ID: <20151116101410.319a420a@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <56499C89.4000402@gentoo.org>
References: <1447458773.ad4c142684afb096e8fff2937ae5c5c3385dd22e.mgorny@gentoo>
	<20151116100118.2dd111d1@gentoo.org>
	<56499C89.4000402@gentoo.org>
Organization: Gentoo
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 7f0c91e7-71c6-4fa1-8c5c-0422d3850473
X-Archives-Hash: 6fc39bff77c155669bc4314d128ee13e

On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 10:06:17 +0100
"Justin Lecher (jlec)" <jlec@gentoo.org> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>=20
> On 16/11/15 10:01, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 23:53:05 +0000 (UTC) "Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny"
> > <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >  =20
> >> commit:     ad4c142684afb096e8fff2937ae5c5c3385dd22e Author:
> >> Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny <mgorny <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> AuthorDate: Fri =
Nov
> >> 13 18:46:33 2015 +0000 Commit:     Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny <mgorny <AT>
> >> gentoo <DOT> org> CommitDate: Fri Nov 13 23:52:53 2015 +0000=20
> >> URL:=20
> >> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=3Dad4c1426
> >>=20
> >> autotools-{utils,multilib}.eclass: Ban for EAPI=3D6
> >>=20
> >> Ban autotools-utils.eclass and dependant
> >> autotools-multilib.eclass for EAPI=3D6 to avoid them being
> >> accidentally enabled. The former eclass should be replaced with
> >> inline code, the latter with multilib-minimal.eclass. =20
> >=20
> >=20
> > Not that I particularly like those eclasses, but I seem to have
> > missed the deprecation warnings for these. I hope you're planning
> > in submitting patches "fixing" consumers... =20
>=20
> Probably the developers should fix their ebuilds when they bump to
> EAPI=3D6. While I haven't looked at the change exactly, Micha=C5=82 annou=
nced
> it as a EAPI >=3D 6 Ban. So no backwards breakages expected.

Probably those that want to ban it should fix the(ir) tree so that
developers have no pain in bumping to eapi6?

While I agree we should move away from those eclasses, the "I decided
to throw the crap at other developers with eapi6 without deprecation
period" is a bit hard to grasp. Esp. when these eclasses were advertised
as the way to go not so long ago...