From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9E613888F for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 22:05:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD38121C058; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 22:05:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de [81.169.146.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3B1121C001 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 22:05:38 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :I3kQYkG6f/ML/Lb0bAYFCBt+SpICkd7E+UrA1ycmip9RDA+sU5XwLTHsZw3L3oZv27ooPQ== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from porto.localnet ([78.129.141.71]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 37.14 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id e00e06r9JM5ZAHf (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (curve secp521r1 with 521 ECDH bits, eq. 15360 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate) for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:05:35 +0200 (CEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] EAPI 6 draft for review Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:07:12 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.0.5-gentoo; KDE/4.14.12; x86_64; ; ) References: <22049.17676.1822.986579@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20151019091243.02aed0d4@gentoo.org> <20151019095834.22f15567.mgorny@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20151019095834.22f15567.mgorny@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201510200007.12443.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: cf3eef72-2578-4316-a0cb-de62f6a75123 X-Archives-Hash: 7905e6d24f13b3514e614b7f131212b3 Am Montag, 19. Oktober 2015, 09:58:34 schrieb Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny: > > Why do you assume I overlooked something? I thought exactly of this > case, and decide that will force developers to finally write sane > eclasses. >=20 Can we adapt the gravitational constant of the universe for this special ca= se=20 too, please? =2D-=20 Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice) dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/