From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7404813888F for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 10:31:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13FB821C071; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 10:31:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30C3B21C05C for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 10:31:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (AMontpellier-655-1-282-73.w81-251.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.251.34.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: aballier) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8545E3405D5 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 10:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 12:31:21 +0200 From: Alexis Ballier To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] EAPI 6 draft for review Message-ID: <20151018123121.7c76ba7a@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20151018120910.6e8ef5af.mgorny@gentoo.org> References: <22049.17676.1822.986579@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20151017220838.0ae4973f@gentoo.org> <20151017232447.3f42d43a.mgorny@gentoo.org> <20151018104701.3b0acf46@gentoo.org> <20151018110127.1f311870.mgorny@gentoo.org> <20151018113415.4901ff3e@gentoo.org> <20151018120910.6e8ef5af.mgorny@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 9bf35385-c451-4dcc-bcf5-508c4272cdbe X-Archives-Hash: aa8e69456729416733a7866104d771a0 On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 12:09:10 +0200 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 11:34:15 +0200 > Alexis Ballier wrote: >=20 > > On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 11:01:27 +0200 > > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > [...] =20 > > > > > It's trivial to change patch to -p1 (I think patchutils can do > > > > > that). =20 > > > >=20 > > > > It is. But the above cases were not whether it is possible, but > > > > rather desirable. =20 > > >=20 > > > Consistency is desirable. There is world outside ebuilds, and they > > > need to apply patches sometimes. =20 > >=20 > > Yes, that's why I find '-p1 relative to $S' inconsistent. Nothing > > wrong with -p1, but $S is from ebuild. If you avoid '$S', then you > > must also drop -p1, simple as that :) =20 >=20 > Relative to cwd. >=20 which is the same, or even worse, since ebuilds can 'cd' whenever they want