Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Referencing bug reports in git

["Michał Górny" <mgorny@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1301 bytes --]

Dnia 2015-08-12, o godz. 18:25:07
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chithanh@gentoo.org> napisał(a):

> Michał Górny schrieb:
> >> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531 format, with the 
> >> "https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=" optional for Gentoo 
> >> Bugzilla, would be a compromise I can accept. I would not like having 
> >> to redundantly give the bug number when I already gave the URL. 
> > Can we make it clear whether we are allowed/supposed to use the short
> > form:
> >
> >    https://bugs.gentoo.org/333531
> >
> > ?
> >
> 
> As that redirects to the longer form I don't see a problem with allowing 
> that.
> 
> Note that the short form does not allow for referencing individual 
> comments, because
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/333531#c4
> redirects to
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531
> and not
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531#c4

Well, to be clear it doesn't actually redirect. If you didn't use one
of those fancy new-age web browsers, you'd notice #c4 works as
expected. I suspect it does some fancy JavaScript addressbar update
though. Anyway, breaking '#c4' should be definitely treated as a bug,
not expected limitation.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 949 bytes --]