Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Referencing bug reports in git

["Michał Górny" <mgorny@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1418 bytes --]

Dnia 2015-08-12, o godz. 17:59:03
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chithanh@gentoo.org> napisał(a):

> hasufell schrieb:
> > So, I've just tried to count the ++ for different ideas and even if I
> > missed one or two or misread someone's opinion, I think the result is
> > pretty clear:
> >
> > reference the bug only in the summary: 1
> > don't make any of this mandatory: 1
> > "Gentoo-Bug: 123" or similar short form: 9
> > "Gentoo-Bug: <url>" or similar long form: 2-3
> >
> 
> As there was no formal call for a vote, I don't think you can take the 
> number of voiced opinions as an indicator for the support of an option. 
> After all, if someone's opinion is already sufficiently represented by 
> an existing post, that person would not have reason to write to -dev and 
> further clutter the discussion.
> 
> The only thing you can derive from this counting is that consensus has 
> not been reached.
> 
> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531 format, with the 
> "https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=" optional for Gentoo Bugzilla, 
> would be a compromise I can accept.
> 
> I would not like having to redundantly give the bug number when I 
> already gave the URL.

Can we make it clear whether we are allowed/supposed to use the short
form:

  https://bugs.gentoo.org/333531

?

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 949 bytes --]