From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907241386F2 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D58DE0835; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:14:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE056E07C2 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:14:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOxDA-0008E7-AK for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 02:14:36 +0200 Received: from 71-17-69-121.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca ([71.17.69.121]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 02:14:36 +0200 Received: from rhill by 71-17-69-121.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 02:14:36 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Referencing bug reports in git Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:17:30 -0600 Organization: Gentoo Message-ID: <20150810181730.3ef13778@caribou.gateway.pace.com> References: <1439128706.40b3fd64ec9c5d6d94f0f0897740bc77622c24a1.xmw@gentoo> <55C75F19.90201@gentoo.org> <20150809215605.27ae6427@pomiot> <20150810004409.59637bea9aefd3f045b67614@gentoo.org> <20150810004044.76dda6e6@pomiot> <20150810021601.cdcae7226373ecd0d284086a@gentoo.org> <21959.62847.967959.705319@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <55C7F833.6040408@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_//kGu.jFfmQb8bHj9Y36yKFa"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 71-17-69-121.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: 55c47e77-84a3-41ec-a358-5d02fe87b9d9 X-Archives-Hash: 2ecb9e2ace285483fb39b5f8a3a88155 --Sig_//kGu.jFfmQb8bHj9Y36yKFa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:25:58 +0000 (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > What about: >=20 > * bug number in summary strongly recommended > ** summary bug number standardized to GB#xxxxxx or #xxxxxx or similar,=20 > short enough for summary, easily identified. GB# would be distinctly=20 > gentoo and could be expanded to KDEB#, GNB# (gnome), FDOB#, etc, for=20 > projects where users likely to want to see the bug likely know what it is. > ** summary lists gentoo bug if any, upstream only if no gentoo bug. >=20 > * bug URL in description required. > ** standardized to Gentoo-Bug: ....... > ** gives people wanting something to click a way to do so > ** U in URL is universal, unambiguously identifies reference for those=20 > unfamiliar with summary shorthand. > ** Multiple allowed, for multiple gentoo bugs or to identify upstream=20 > bugs (using FDO-Bug: or similar) as well. >=20 > That seems a reasonable compromise, given people pulling both ways > in-thread. Making the bug number in the summary manditory or strongly encouraged leads= to wonderful commit messages like: --- cat-pkg: Fix bug #504321. Gentoo-Bug: 504321 --- I would like to see this be more common: --- cat-pkg: Make the thingy work again. Gentoo-Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/504321 or 504321 Idon'tcarewhich ---- If we're limiting the summary to 1 line, 70-75 chars, manditory cat/package and bug number there's not a lot of room to summarize in. --=20 Ryan Hill psn: dirtyepic_sk gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org 47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463 --Sig_//kGu.jFfmQb8bHj9Y36yKFa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.1 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVyT8aAAoJEO04vUmVeoRjAzkIALCwTuqKhBFFUNcoPz5z42fE qedsFGmojrrXHQch4zooMcllXEj04aabbrWtkARccpxraI+K58GKknE2xyGaz5k2 haIE2TKX169Waucl88x07xTu5K19xoIgLTCg8IxQJBYwPvduF9/biHNSydJf5EE4 AwL2fIxtbjFIB39SrX6zp9p5wPmCP90cp4l8TWzFitr2aHcviwy/mmemurWX2ARg omvWlz1oCWs07mXzbo98RMmCYrd5ob2djfZ+7k2aTlReRm0uzKoHzljRuJru0+63 JTLcs3EZ0uNbiWN+6VTz64sLWUKa4iQ12glmb+iBJCSr0A5HJfxb57hMKs6C8vg= =z0sG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_//kGu.jFfmQb8bHj9Y36yKFa--