From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767F4138CCF for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 10:39:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DEF1EE0858; Tue, 12 May 2015 10:39:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from foo.stuge.se (foo.stuge.se [212.116.89.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49DD8E084B for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 10:39:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5860 invoked by uid 501); 12 May 2015 10:39:34 -0000 Message-ID: <20150512103934.5859.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 12:39:34 +0200 From: Peter Stuge To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Anti-spam changes: proposal to drop spammy mail Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20150511072901.GB15066@angelfall> <555103A7.9030405@gentoo.org> <55511563.9040005@gentoo.org> <20150512051934.GA2905@angelfall> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: fa1e588c-1959-4d7f-8960-93610d35c4af X-Archives-Hash: a8435efc15e8697d0241b1591df49264 Rich Freeman wrote: > I find email an incredibly frustrating experience all-around. It > works great as long as everybody doesn't use anybody for hosting who > isn't in the top-10 provider list, and doesn't use a mailing list. DMARC marks top-10 essentially creating their own walled email garden. It will only get worse. One might even think that they don't like open source projects and as much as they like their product (oops, I mean their users). //Peter