From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-70394-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1FCA138CCF
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 11 May 2015 16:33:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F729E0904;
	Mon, 11 May 2015 16:32:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46CD2E08F7
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 11 May 2015 16:32:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (i19-les02-th2-5-48-220-179.sfr.lns.abo.bbox.fr [5.48.220.179])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: aballier)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA724340691
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 11 May 2015 16:32:43 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 18:32:38 +0200
From: Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Anti-spam changes: proposal to drop spammy mail
Message-ID: <20150511183238.65140654@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150511172001.78379fd3@googlemail.com>
References: <robbat2-20150511T030343-086083177Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
	<5550AE30.4060706@nerot.com>
	<CAOnawYo3ahtxThrZO2J-Y7PRW2kWaeC4Dx5d33t4B0ShCJj0dg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGfcS_kQL1p7oqYLYjLkiOWEJgbbtVAn7A4x9KtHO+2fLGddTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOnawYre6bLedwyObs404mDHiOOSL1qB4Aypu01MedAnXAvcRw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGfcS_mc4+otSZCZTWH2Yyi7YmKBEtN=cZrxUHEewO5PFfsOaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOnawYosQR57gqscbT6a3Hd1Unoe0k=TubEMfc0vT55B4D6XZw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150511181710.311cf6eb@gentoo.org>
	<20150511172001.78379fd3@googlemail.com>
Organization: Gentoo
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.27; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 39f44bb1-f72f-4c88-9491-c110881751f7
X-Archives-Hash: e01e9e53f21d768e616679613f485770

On Mon, 11 May 2015 17:20:01 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 11 May 2015 18:17:10 +0200
> Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > You should probably think about the difference between public code
> > being mirrored at github and giving some big company access to
> > private emails.
> 
> Like your phone company, ISP, and national intelligence agencies?

I think you know the answer for those...

And even with clear text emails going through them, unless
they've managed to secretly obtain decades of cryptography advances,
they can't know e.g. what I do actually read and even less how much time
I spend reading it (and probably dozens of others statistics I can't
even imagine), which correlation is actually much more valuable than
the raw data itself.