From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6881138CA2 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 05:18:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E8EE6E089A; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 05:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BE8DE086C for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 05:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from marga.jer-c2.orkz.net (D4B2706A.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [212.178.112.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jer) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BEFC9340B36 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 05:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 07:18:23 +0200 From: Jeroen Roovers To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Should this be considered a gcc bug? Message-ID: <20150421071823.1538fdd6@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.27; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a016b335-43c7-4e13-84a9-6add92381d14 X-Archives-Hash: f38ab6cff7c43b6fb288fd852fa45d44 On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:57:16 +0600 (NOVT) grozin@gentoo.org wrote: > However, after this fix the upstream CFLAGS were appended to the > user-supplyed ${CFLAGS}. And the upstream CFLAGS contain -O3. There is your problem. We filter out those compiler flags that affect the output, so -O3 should go (and e.g. -Wall could stay). jer