From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E037138A1A for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 05:56:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F04EBE0903; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 05:56:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12733E08FA for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 05:56:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot.lan (87-205-67-137.adsl.inetia.pl [87.205.67.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D39D3405DB; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 05:56:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 06:56:07 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: hasufell Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] LibreSSL, introduce virtual/openssl Message-ID: <20150123065607.74cd64d1@pomiot.lan> In-Reply-To: <54C1A91C.8010702@gentoo.org> References: <53C12C21.6070605@gentoo.org> <54C1A91C.8010702@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/.23dGMXn.lde3x2fasL87rk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 986b12bc-c0d1-42b7-bef5-42c2f44d05d7 X-Archives-Hash: b2f8f07d1b960a12384d3b7d01bb8690 --Sig_/.23dGMXn.lde3x2fasL87rk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dnia 2015-01-23, o godz. 01:51:24 hasufell napisa=C5=82(a): > Regarding the last libav discussion I think we should also go with a > "libressl" USE flag instead of creating a virtual that makes handling > SUBSLOTs impossible. If libressl and openssl would have matching ABIs, that wouldn't be necessary and you could what virtual/libudev does, i.e. explicit subslot deps. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/.23dGMXn.lde3x2fasL87rk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUweJ7XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2REJCMDdDQzRGMERBRDA2RUEwQUZFNDFC MDdBMUFFQUVGQjQ0NjRFAAoJELB6GurvtEZO1CEP/j/U3qFyv4c+wIfz/8Rbx0h8 nHR7jb+Hyw76I1BNayyEMUzI+WbDd8XKEwPmWW96Ro/usZAKg5udFPvwr6ARt1Gz A3yZMNLAUJyOZPJmog0HErRY5mC/6VQ+tmMD3AjZeVZ39jV5zaXt2SB71z89+Gnx fwjNHzRuLMYvbo5fTgu6z5UK/+obENyfxcGztFEywdv5fqrpIkP96FFR1sPC3IZD XLsaHLPyfSop9MeOygUsptLfm53mhGrt+RX/PFe6tQMSCTVAb2q3nUObIONvaHPw VDDsQpEHSW+4ElgIy8M4Jxp22eBAeSShZSGMvf3vKbro1CDQHDdTxFnACx64noEz j0bT9lqrxiviS8EXcaK7DDvCGTDeHE2bUg2V0iHU4kefTDlHwmFCbd2z+E9C6n+q +0UYPmNwP5vTQWBu29fOCtfyBowOBVf/zW60E8mxq7ZVcUzPg0+h5y3UQQvf759s a2ng43l9UHrejp/qpson/GgMdlDns6i8WYQgKXrpHqD+Y5NavR+AoojOIBfW1Mld NP9bbVFypLeRTR9dFC3RHYXPkJ6s2XLE5SkTt9sNyoCk32G3ns5dH78lGFzT8fFg cyxB/6c0X2j0IjzctBJYay1JhZi8tQQLalpK5LQuffEV3kLkiI/7BfV0gZJUkKyC jkWE4DxLCoraPxoOCzqt =5enM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/.23dGMXn.lde3x2fasL87rk--