From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDB413877A for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 12:55:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0291E0B47; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 12:55:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3055E09AE for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 12:55:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shanghai.paradoxon.rec (p4FDABF9F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.218.191.159]) (using SSLv3 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: polynomial-c) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BF3834002E; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 12:55:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 14:55:24 +0200 From: Lars Wendler To: Rich Freeman Cc: gentoo-dev , "J. Roeleveld" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] systemd profiles Message-ID: <20140830145524.7446d838@shanghai.paradoxon.rec> In-Reply-To: References: <5401080E.8090904@gentoo.org> <1863932.qRLQGIk0OP@andromeda> <20140830134126.2b1a6da7@pomiot.lan> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/7g9JQZvx=FIDvCnNJ9CDs=+"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: cba952cb-3e1f-403d-b2f4-1cdd40d497bc X-Archives-Hash: 9fcc7b66d8104d9b0af0cb1fbe8b198f --Sig_/7g9JQZvx=FIDvCnNJ9CDs=+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 08:03:10 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: >On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny >wrote: >> Dnia 2014-08-30, o godz. 13:27:08 >> "J. Roeleveld" napisa=C5=82(a): >>> >>> Not sure if this idea has been discussed before, but: >>> Wouldn't it be an idea to have a "virtual/init" which depends on 1 >>> of: >> >> You mean our virtual/service-manager? >> > >Micha=C5=82 is already well-aware of this one, but for general interest, >the main blocker to actually doing this is: >https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D504116 Which is really a shame that there's such slow progress. I already added several patches to the blocking bugs but none was fixed meanwhile... >Rich > Lars --=20 Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 4DD8 C47C CDFA 5295 E1A6 3FC8 F696 74AB 981C A6FC --Sig_/7g9JQZvx=FIDvCnNJ9CDs=+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUAcnAAAoJEPiazRVxLXTFc8sQAIHls4l8FRIS0TN0nvj4pS51 DSFowZHcph+PKEL3OVV5Hk8jttlGVnyOJvxTUbB+RPU9Voz2VXtfn72wJywVuH/8 5TTx5OFQ423+CnlMzmZy7xpN1iKUhBCp6E9kzPq9sf6IBGmggT2GJYhYEo2g+3/m Hws40z8pZ3qvDEqHjilknN+Je5gU61PONhGGy+0NEVAER5jk5x+AFzJtMJgS5wh5 07nyeesNVqp5TW7eIqBykSscnHpS6p6glYob2RPLHB2CrLUQIDkrayulemFRnf9v aGLprCdNGd8sipg7oPDwZg4iIwAix1E3HFITTxd+ZAWXXDh/w6ZppuyJ3g1lIYOs 0ONLIyO3PCvVzUmdrojOu1p2gRtXwgbm2uM3uytArOxQ5KzKtu6UpvGhxIcS062c ihqjFp2tf7+izcm1/IIx72J47D+bIUj69w/c7VvFKtaWZ26BGN/l6MD3Mpa+k1t5 z699lXXboa6XnvyDDhwf56J9nVoYMycCYUYmzepO9/NM7FsK2pDaoRz1e/5VATp9 fq3b5egtBwe6THfb6fW+B46zmPh6xaAIqDSUdIPkciGbXjkVXRKj8LGZV0V2ft4F vCMfQTEDKyc4GsTJvKgyHmYS1cVpRj6Kuu3ogmhnGcyUF/4ouQxk0dt9LOTt4CoV Qaspcoaucv3C1RiKPLG5 =ySMW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/7g9JQZvx=FIDvCnNJ9CDs=+--