From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548FE13877A for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 07:04:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BDBAE0A49; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 07:04:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baptiste.telenet-ops.be (baptiste.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.51]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036EDE09EB for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 07:04:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org ([84.197.67.29]) by baptiste.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id e74A1o0020dt3XY0174AW0; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:04:10 +0200 Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:04:07 +0200 From: Tom Wijsman To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: aranea@aixah.de Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-libs/x265: x265-1.0.ebuild ChangeLog x265-1.2.ebuild x265-0.8.ebuild Message-ID: <20140813090407.2185b569@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20140730134837.105a747c@gentp.lnet> References: <20140727190116.B09072004E@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <53D5F0A5.5090908@gentoo.org> <20140730134837.105a747c@gentp.lnet> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/xeba7JB+yHrvWAC6DI+KwaS"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 617b3cae-e93c-47ab-8d5f-e288f9f81a42 X-Archives-Hash: ea977161602f4d2b233297d762836fa2 --Sig_/xeba7JB+yHrvWAC6DI+KwaS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 13:48:37 +0200 Luis Ressel wrote: > I think I'd rather go with the original workflow. Okay, perhaps > package.masking -9999 is a bit uncommon and clutters package.mask, but > it's not all *that* bad and it eases the workflow. Depends on whose workflow you are referring to; it doesn't affect the maintainer, but the clutter can be a pain if you attempt to keep the p.mask size low. Having package.mask as a directory would be a solution to this; however, there's not much other need for it to be a directory. --=20 With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D --Sig_/xeba7JB+yHrvWAC6DI+KwaS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT6w3oAAoJEPWZc8roOL/QRn4H/AgYc1JSV5y8I48U8SNxqHuQ 8P5YxANo1+q5mGLf4EvaCHRY707THpSkSuPPIWwzqNZgkER9ml+NwTLcAjQaIhj4 rEtnnR1zldFPJ38aVHg0TxE7bvmqohcQypRLV0QX+nlhQ8078GqnlMX0qJYvuggC Exmci40gD98Nl+IrQEvrqTJ7KpvWzb4j3EFvPxe6L3Zgc6USSMVMX7sJyxMPc55s guWuBTTp5KTHOaypKCWHSU5PjzmN+5MdxqHMikYPWoGc1PNMQ4pzRKYSeGrC96Ip JaMXIBUDlrIII34b+FFHrLDHDmPfi5njO1zzV8MJlKxJkgWdd6rLlTBBf29tt+I= =P5wa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/xeba7JB+yHrvWAC6DI+KwaS--